Data snapshot: July 2026

The Glasp Reading Report 2026

Glasp is a social highlighting platform used by 1,000,000+ readers. This report shares what that community actually reads, highlights, and asks AI about, as anonymized aggregates. Methodology at the bottom.

Atomic Habits

is the most-highlighted Kindle book on Glasp, ahead of Building a Second Brain

22.4%

of AI summarizing targets research and academic sources, the largest curated category

57%

of language-identified YouTube video summaries are for videos in languages other than English

The most-highlighted Kindle books

Ranked by how many Glasp readers highlighted each book, per edition language. The English list is a portrait of what serious readers underline: habit formation, note-taking systems, money psychology, and Stoicism. The Japanese list adds a distinct canon of business and philosophy titles that barely overlaps with it, and the Spanish and Portuguese lists are led by translated classics alongside homegrown authors. Each title links to its highlights page on Glasp.

As an Amazon Associate, Glasp earns from qualifying purchases.

What people ask AI to summarize

Shares of hand-curated categories among the top pages users summarize with Glasp's AI (excluding video, entertainment, and auto-triggered pages; see methodology). The picture is serious: research papers are the largest named category, and the second is AI tools themselves. People summarize what AI told them.

Research & Academia22.4%

journal articles, preprints, and academic databases

AI Tools17.5%

outputs from AI chat and research tools, summarized again

Social14.1%

discussion threads and professional networks

Docs & Knowledge Bases11.2%

shared documents, wikis, and internal knowledge bases

Developer3.4%

code hosting and technical Q&A

Government & Public Sector3%

tax agencies, ministries, and legislatures across seven countries

News & Media2.4%

news sites and magazines

Learning & Courses1.2%

course platforms and study resources

The languages of video learning

Language shares of the YouTube videos people summarize with Glasp, among summaries whose video language could be identified. English leads, but over 57% happens in other languages, led by Korean, Japanese, and Spanish. AI summarization is quietly a global study tool.

English
42.7%
Korean
16.2%
Japanese
11.6%
Spanish
8.3%
Vietnamese
4.5%
Portuguese
4.2%
Hindi
2.3%
Russian
1.8%
Indonesian
1.5%
Arabic
1.2%
French
1%
German
0.9%

Methodology

Privacy questions, answered

Is any individual user's data in this report?

No. Every number is an aggregate across many users. Book rankings count how many readers highlighted a book, never who. Category shares are computed over distinct users per category, and language shares over anonymized, aggregated usage. No highlight text, usernames, or individual reading histories appear anywhere.

What data does the report use?

Three aggregate sources: counts of readers per Kindle book, hand-curated category shares of the pages users summarize with AI, and the language distribution of YouTube video summaries. All three are aggregate, de-identified statistics; no individual accounts or content were examined.

Why publish this at all?

Reading behavior at scale is usually locked inside companies. Amazon stopped publishing Kindle popular highlights years ago, and most public statistics on reading and AI use come from surveys rather than behavior. Publishing aggregates, with the methodology in the open, is our attempt to fill that gap. Our research papers at glasp.co/research follow the same principle.

Go deeper

The behavioral research behind Glasp, including six arXiv papers on how people highlight, lives at glasp.co/research. For the statistics on whether highlighting even works, see Highlighting Statistics.