How was a MiG 29 used to strike the FSB building?

TL;DR

A Ukrainian MiG 29 delivered French AASM Hammer bombs to the FSB headquarters using improvised targeting on an iPad. The mission relied on low altitude flight to evade radar, GPS guided munitions with inertial backup, and a toss bombing sequence to hit a hardened target while Russian defenses reacted slowly.

Transcript

at exactly 0545 on May 26th 2025 this Ukrainian Air Force pilot strapped himself into the cockpit of a MiG 29 fighter that had no business carrying the weapons it had bolted to its wings Within minutes this 40-year-old Soviet fighter would attempt something its designers never imagined Delivering French precisiong guided bombs against Russia's most... Read More

Key Insights

• AASM Hammer bombs used inertial navigation with GPS backup to reach a target from up to 70 km away.
• The mission combined foreign precision weapons with a Soviet era aircraft through improvised pylons and duct taped targeting interfaces.
• A treetop level flight profile limited radar visibility but required precise energy management and high pilot skill.
• The bombs used a rocket assisted propulsion segment to extend reach and increase impact energy, enabling penetration of a five story building.
• The targeting data was translated onto the bombs via an iPad mounted on the cockpit, enabling communication with modern munitions not originally compatible with the MiG 29.
• Russian air defenses would only have about 45 seconds from detection to engagement for low altitude pop ups, creating a narrow window for action.
• The interceptors could not detect the low altitude, fast moving target effectively, allowing the mission to proceed to release.
• The overall operation demonstrates how battlefield improvisation can extend the reach of older platforms into modern precision warfare.
• More videos from this channel:
  • How NATO Intercepted Russian MiG-31 in Baltic Airspace
  • How did Ukrainian drones disable Engels base with AI swarm
• More from this channel: Beyond Military

Questions & Answers

Q: A real search query question about the video (e.g. 'How to...', 'What is...', 'Why does...', 'When should...'). Question 1

The operation shows how a 40 year old MiG 29 was repurposed with French AASM Hammer missiles and an improvised iPad based targeting system to perform a precision strike on a high value target. It explains the complex integration of satellites, inertial navigation and custom pylons to guide the weapons along a 70 km mission profile, including a treetop approach and a rapid disengagement.

Q: Question 2

The video describes the path of the mission from launch at the runway to a low altitude departure as the craft controlled by the pilot performed a careful toss bombing maneuver. It highlights the need for countdown accuracy, sensor fusion and control surface adjustments to maintain stability while the missiles reach their target.

Q: Question 3

It explains the AASM Hammer’s three part design: a GPS plus inertial navigation guidance system, a solid rocket motor for extended range, and precision tail surfaces for terminal guidance. This combination allowed a bomb to be steered toward a specific window and penetrate the target effectively.

Q: Question 4

The video discusses the risk and strategy of flying at 50 meters altitude to avoid radar while keeping enough speed to outpace air defenses. It emphasizes how terrain following requires constant control input and awareness of obstacles such as power lines and structures.

Q: Question 5

The description covers the S 400 system response window, noting about 45 seconds from detection to engagement for low altitude targets. It explains why the low altitude flight profile was critical to avoid the system’s tracking and engagement envelope during the approach.

Q: Question 6

The analysis notes that the Russian 48 N6 missiles and 92N6 gravestone radar form a sophisticated defense, but time constraints and low altitude vulnerability reduced effectiveness against a small, fast moving target moving behind terrain and structures.

Q: Question 7

It outlines how the iPad acted as a bridge between modern targeting data and older avionics, illustrating a practical example of field improvisation by engineers to enable advanced guidance data to be usable by the MiG 29’s cockpit systems.

Q: Question 8

The video asserts that the mission demonstrates how innovation and courage can enable a seemingly impossible act by integrating diverse technologies, showcasing the potential for improvised precision warfare where legacy platforms are upgraded with modern munitions and targeting methods.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• A detailed look at how improvised tech and advanced weapons together enabled a high risk strike on a Russian security target, showing the integration of French AASM Hammer missiles with a Soviet era MiG 29 and improvised targeting.

• The report explains the flight profile, from treetop approach to a high altitude release that used GPS and inertial navigation to guide the bombs to a pre programmed point, followed by a rapid retreat.

• The video also analyzes defense responses, including S 400 radar timing, interceptor missiles, and the challenges of engaging a low flying, fast moving unmanned target until it released the ordnance.