Michael Malice Reacts To Facebook’s Covid Flip-Flop

TL;DR

Facebook's reversal on COVID origins highlights the misuse of power by overlords and emphasizes the need for alternative information pathways.

Transcript

what about the covid's turnaround from facebook now that covered skepticism in terms of the origin of it if you had a look at this yeah oh yeah they're dropping their uh um i i this is i think going to be very revelatory to very many people hopefully uh and i my i pray uh every day to loki that this is going to make some people realize how duplicit... Read More

Key Insights

• 🖤 Facebook's change in stance on COVID origin exposes the misuse of power and lack of accountability by platforms.
• 🤗 Governments' involvement in bioengineering viruses should be open to discussion and scrutiny.
• 🥺 The penalization of individuals for questioning COVID's origin leads to increased skepticism and the development of alternative information platforms.
• 🐕‍🦺 Powerful individuals, including politicians, are not solely motivated by public service, and their personal interests often influence their decisions.
• ✊ It is crucial to remain skeptical and question the actions and intentions of those in positions of power.
• 🖤 The lack of recompense or apology for wrong decisions shows a disregard for individual rights and accountability.
• 👋 Expecting powerful people to prioritize the public's best interest without personal motivations is unrealistic.

Questions & Answers

Q: What is the significance of Facebook's change in stance on COVID origin?

Facebook's reversal highlights the immense power held by platforms and the potential for misuse when limiting discussions and penalizing skeptics. It raises questions about the objectivity of these platforms and their ability to make educated decisions.

Q: How does the bioengineering of viruses relate to the COVID discussion?

While the origin of COVID may remain debatable, the broader point is that governments are actively involved in bioengineering viruses. This should be a topic of discussion, as it has implications beyond COVID and challenges the authority's monopoly on information.

Q: What consequences do individuals face for questioning COVID origin?

Penalized individuals on social media platforms like Facebook often experience the loss of their accounts or are locked out for extended periods. This lack of recourse leads to greater skepticism towards entities and the creation of alternative information pathways.

Q: Why should the motives of powerful individuals be questioned?

It is unrealistic to assume that individuals in positions of power do not have self-driven motives. While some may work towards the country's best interest, it is essential to recognize that their hunger for power and career success often plays a significant role in decision-making.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Facebook's initial stance on COVID origin limited discussions and penalized skeptics, but now acknowledges the possibility of being wrong.

• Governments are actively bioengineering viruses, which should be addressed rather than suppressing discussion on specific cases.

• Lack of recourse for penalized individuals on social media platforms has led to the creation of alternative information pathways.