The Never Ending Road to Product Market Fit — Wikipedia's Struggle with Creators

Kazuki Nakayashiki

Hatched by Kazuki Nakayashiki

Aug 12, 2023

4 min read

0

The Never Ending Road to Product Market Fit — Wikipedia's Struggle with Creators

In the world of startups and product development, achieving product-market fit is often seen as the holy grail. It's the point where your product or service perfectly meets the needs and desires of your target market. But getting there is no easy task. It requires a deep understanding of your audience, constant iteration and improvement, and a keen eye for key indicators along the way.

One key indicator in the journey to product-market fit is the Leading Indicator Survey. This survey, created by Sean Ellis, asks users how they would feel if they could no longer use the product. The measure of success is if 40% or more respond with "Very Disappointed." This survey gives valuable insights into how your audience perceives your product and whether it's meeting their needs.

Another important metric to consider is the Net Promoter Score (NPS). While this metric can provide insights into customer satisfaction and loyalty, it has its limitations. It can generate false positives and doesn't provide a clear understanding of the size of the market. Understanding the size of the market is crucial in determining how much you should accelerate your growth.

But it's not just about what people say they would do, it's about what they're actually doing. Leading indicator engagement data provides insights into the actions and events users are taking within your product. This data helps validate the survey responses and gives you a more accurate picture of whether you're on the path to product-market fit.

Once you have an understanding of user engagement, it's important to look at the retention curve. Plotting the percentage of active users over time for different cohorts can reveal whether you've found product-market fit for a specific market or audience. If the retention curve flattens off at some point, it's a good indication that you're on the right track. But it's also important to identify the characteristics of those who retained versus those who didn't. This information helps you understand your audience and market better.

In the case of Wikipedia, there's an ongoing struggle with creators and their notability. Out of the 1.7 million biographies on Wikipedia, only 20% feature women. The concept of notability itself is subjective, and Wikipedia tries to address this by setting guidelines for satisfying notability. The more reputable and secondary media coverage a biographical subject has, the more likely their biography will be approved. However, this approach has its limitations.

The credibility of publications and what constitutes a reliable secondary source can vary depending on the country and the context. Mainstream publications may not cover what goes on in creator circles, and this can pose a challenge for creators seeking recognition on platforms like Wikipedia. There's a reliance on publications that Wikipedia deems reputable, which may not always align with the interests and perspectives of creators and their audiences.

Creators have the ability to establish their own notability through their content and impact. In fact, consumers often trust influencer product recommendations more than celebrity endorsements. This shift in trust and influence raises questions about how creators fit into our documentation and history. The gatekeeping of information on platforms like Wikipedia, where a small group of editors hold significant power, can hinder the recognition and representation of creators.

As the Creator Revolution continues to grow, the struggle to define a creator's notability on platforms like Wikipedia will persist. The system of relying on reliable sources, as determined by a select group of editors, may need to be reevaluated to ensure a more inclusive and accurate representation of creators and their contributions.

In conclusion, the road to product-market fit is a never-ending journey that requires constant attention and adaptation. Key indicators like the Leading Indicator Survey and retention curves can provide valuable insights into your audience and market. However, it's important to recognize the limitations and subjectivity of these metrics. Similarly, the struggle with creators and notability on platforms like Wikipedia highlights the need for a more inclusive and nuanced approach to documenting and recognizing their contributions. As we navigate these challenges, here are three actionable pieces of advice:

  1. Continuously gather feedback and data from your users to understand their needs and preferences. This will help guide your product development and ensure that you're on the right track to achieving product-market fit.

  2. Diversify your sources of information and perspectives. Relying solely on mainstream publications or a select group of editors can limit your understanding and representation of different audiences and creators.

  3. Foster a culture of inclusivity and diversity within your organization. Recognize the value and importance of diverse perspectives and experiences in shaping your product and serving your market.

By incorporating these actions and insights, we can strive for a more accurate and inclusive representation of creators and their contributions, while also achieving product-market fit in an ever-changing landscape.

Sources

← Back to Library

Hatch New Ideas with Glasp AI 🐣

Glasp AI allows you to hatch new ideas based on your curated content. Let's curate and create with Glasp AI :)

Start Hatching 🐣