The Struggle of Notability and the Philosophy of Knowledge

Hatched by Kazuki
Sep 03, 2023
4 min read
1 views
Copy Link
The Struggle of Notability and the Philosophy of Knowledge
Introduction:
In the digital age, the struggle for notability and credibility has become increasingly relevant, particularly in platforms like Wikipedia. The concept of notability is subjective, which raises questions about the border of a "reliable" secondary source. Additionally, the credibility of publications can vary depending on the country. This article explores the challenges faced by creators on Wikipedia and delves into the philosophy of knowledge.
The Struggle for Notability on Wikipedia:
Wikipedia, the massive online encyclopedia, features over 1.7 million biographies, but only 20% of them are about women. The notion of notability is inherently subjective, leading Wikipedia to establish detailed guidelines to determine notability. One of the key factors in determining notability is the presence of reputable, secondary media coverage about the biographical subject. However, this criterion can be problematic when it comes to creators who gain significant recognition within their respective fields. For example, a highly influential creator on a popular app may not be considered notable enough for Wikipedia. This highlights the need for clearer criteria and a more inclusive approach to notability.
The Role of Secondary Sources:
On platforms like Wikipedia, secondary sources play a crucial role in establishing notability. However, mainstream publications often overlook what goes on in creator circles, leaving creators relying on gaming or esports news publications for recognition. Unfortunately, Wikipedia might not consider these publications reputable enough, demanding coverage from established sources like The New York Times. This bias limits the representation of creators and their contributions on the platform. It is essential to recognize the influence of secondary sources while also acknowledging the need for a broader range of reputable publications.
Creators and Their Notability:
Content creators have the power to establish their own notability through their work. With the Creator Revolution in full swing, creators have become influential figures, often trusted more than traditional celebrities. In fact, 92% of consumers trust an influencer's product recommendation more than a celebrity endorsement. This shift in influence challenges the traditional notions of notability and calls for a reevaluation of how creators fit into our documentation and history. The gatekeeping of information by a small group of Wikipedia editors, the majority of whom are male, further emphasizes the need for a more inclusive and diverse approach.
The Philosophy of Knowledge:
Shifting gears, the article now delves into the philosophy of knowledge. The concept of the self is examined, highlighting the idea that one's identity is not tied to a central, indivisible entity. The notion that the self is a collection of cells driven by various forces challenges our everyday understanding of identity. This realization leads to the question of what it means to exist and the implications of such a perspective.
The Breakdown of Abstractions:
The article further explores how concepts and abstractions break down when pushed too far. The evolution of language and the development of abstract ideas have taken thousands of years. Theoretical knowledge, though often driven by curiosity rather than practicality, holds immense power. While not all ideas have immediate practical applications, they can often lead to surprising and useful discoveries. The article emphasizes the importance of clear communication and the potential dangers of writing that sounds impressive but lacks clarity.
The Future of Philosophy:
As philosophy evolves, it must adapt to the changing times. The article suggests a shift towards a more practical approach to philosophy, one that seeks to discover useful ideas rather than focusing solely on abstract concepts. By using precise language and incorporating precise meanings, philosophy can become a practical tool for problem-solving. This approach not only attracts individuals with good intentions but also exposes the flaws in writing driven by bad intentions.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the struggle for notability on platforms like Wikipedia highlights the need for clearer criteria and a more inclusive approach. The philosophy of knowledge challenges our understanding of identity and the breakdown of concepts when pushed too far. By embracing a practical approach to philosophy and valuing clear communication, we can unlock the potential for new discoveries and a more inclusive understanding of the world.
Actionable Advice:
- 1. Embrace a more inclusive approach to notability by recognizing the impact and influence of creators in diverse fields.
- 2. Encourage the incorporation of reputable sources that cover creator circles and their achievements, ensuring a more balanced representation on platforms like Wikipedia.
- 3. Promote clear communication and the use of precise language in philosophical writing, fostering a better understanding and practical application of ideas.
By combining the struggles faced by creators on Wikipedia with the philosophy of knowledge, we gain a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.
Copy Link