"Members only" bug.

TL;DR

A video intended for everyone was mistakenly marked as members-only, leading to negative feedback and accusations of selling out.

Transcript

okay I have no idea what just happened but all I know is I pushed a video public that was supposed to be for everybody and people hated it I was like what was so wrong about what I said like I'm just like trying to save you guys money and everyone's like sellout I hate this guy and then I started reading the comments and I started to like realize t... Read More

Key Insights

• 🥺 The accidental publication of a members-only video led to accusations of being a sellout and hypocrisy from the audience.
• 🔂 The creator emphasizes the excessive reaction of unsubscribing over a single mistake after years of content.
• ⌛ The purpose of uploading unlisted videos initially is to prevent potential demonetization in the first 24 to 48 hours.
• 🎮 Members have access to the unlisted videos during that period as an added perk.
• 🎮 Intentional marking of videos as members-only is not possible on YouTube, and the creator believes it would be a dishonest tactic if it were.
• 🌱 The creator clarifies that their opinion on members-only content remains unchanged, and they do not plan to implement it for regular videos.
• 🫵 The video was mistakenly published as members-only, causing confusion and frustration among viewers.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why did the audience react negatively to the mistakenly published members-only video?

The audience believed that the content creator was being a hypocrite by restricting access to certain videos, causing them to accuse him of selling out and threatening to unsubscribe. Despite the mistake, the backlash was deemed excessive by the creator.

Q: How does the creator monetize their videos?

The creator relies on ad revenue generated through YouTube. However, due to potential demonetization within the first 24 to 48 hours of uploading, the creator initially releases videos as unlisted. Members are given access to these unlisted videos as a perk, but the videos are eventually made public for all viewers.

Q: Can anyone intentionally mark their videos as members-only?

No, intentionally marking videos as members-only is not possible on YouTube. It was just a bug in the system that caused the mistakenly published members-only video. The creator emphasizes that even if it was possible, it would be considered a lame and dishonest tactic.

Q: Will the creator continue to publish members-only content?

No, the creator states that they will not create members-only content in terms of video content. They believe that tutorials and other videos should be accessible to everyone. However, members will still have perks, such as early access to unlisted videos for the first 24 to 48 hours.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The content creator accidentally published a video that was meant for all viewers but was marked as members-only, resulting in backlash from the audience.

• Readers accused the creator of being a hypocrite and threatened to unsubscribe, despite the mistake being a one-time mishap.

• The creator clarifies that they will not create members-only content and explains the purpose of releasing unlisted videos to prevent demonetization.