Corrupt Biden DOJ Targets Journalist For Covering J6 & PROVING Police Lied | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR
An investigative journalist, Steve Baker, discusses how he has been threatened and targeted by the Department of Justice for his work as a journalist on January 6.
Key Insights
- ๐คจ The Department of Justice's treatment of Steve Baker raises concerns about the weaponization of the justice system.
- ๐ผ Baker's case highlights the potential bias and unfairness in the legal system towards independent journalists.
- ๐๏ธ Other independent journalists, without the same level of coverage, legal support, and reach as Baker, have been overwhelmed by the system.
- ๐คจ A judge's refusal to allow a jury to see an independent journalist's press badges raises questions about selective prosecution.
- ๐ The case of Steven Horn, who received a lenient sentence due to favorable media coverage, highlights the disparity in outcomes for journalists involved in the January 6 events.
- ๐ JD Rivera's case demonstrates how individuals connected to pro-Trump movements have faced severe sentences, even for minor offenses.
- ๐คจ The lack of communication and transparency from the DOJ regarding charges raises concerns about due process for Baker.
Transcript
Read and summarize the transcript of this video on Glasp Reader (beta).
Questions & Answers
Q: Why did the Department of Justice threaten Steve Baker and issue a grand jury subpoena?
According to Baker, he believes that actors within the DOJ are trying to silence him as he was acting as a journalist on January 6. The specific reason for the threats and subpoena is unclear.
Q: How did Baker respond to the threats and subpoena?
Baker went on a media press offensive, including press releases, podcasts, and interviews, to bring attention to his case. He complied with the subpoena and provided his videos to the DOJ, as he had nothing to hide.
Q: What concerns did Baker have about the grand jury subpoena?
Baker was worried about what charges he may face, as grand juries are typically seated for felony charges rather than misdemeanors. He questioned what the DOJ had been scheming and concocting during the 20 months of silence.
Q: Has Baker received any updates on the charges?
No, Baker has not heard from the DOJ since they postponed his self-surrender until after Christmas. As of the end of January, he had not been informed of the charges he may be facing.
Summary & Key Takeaways
-
Baker received a grand jury subpoena for his work as a journalist on January 6, despite offering his videos to the FBI during his interview and cooperating fully.
-
The grand jury subpoena raised concerns about what charges Baker may face, as grand juries are usually seated for felony charges, not misdemeanors.
-
Baker has been waiting for updates on the charges for months, but the DOJ has not contacted him since delaying his self-surrender until after Christmas.
Share This Summary ๐
Explore More Summaries from Timcast IRL ๐





