Is JD Vance Advocating Multiple Elector Slates?

TL;DR

JD Vance argues that there were significant issues in the 2020 election and contends that litigating the legitimacy of electors is a valid solution. His stance raises alarms about democratic norms, as AB Stoddard critiques Vance for potentially endorsing autocracy and inciting constitutional crises among disillusioned voters.

Transcript

welcome to the dark side I'm JVL with AB Stoddard of the bullwark we're going to let JD Vance the senator the the gentleman from the great state of Ohio have the first word so you're not troubled by the sexual assault and defamation let me ask you about January 6 you've been mentioned as a possible vice president for Donald Trump had you been vice ... Read More

Key Insights

• 🤨 JD Vance's defense of questioning election results and advocating for multiple slates of electors raises concerns about his support for democratic principles.
• 🖤 Vance's avoidance of directly answering whether he would have certified the election results suggests a lack of commitment to the peaceful transfer of power and democratic norms.
• 🤗 AB Stoddard highlights the dangers of promoting views that undermine democracy, particularly among voters who are disengaged from the political system and may be open to undemocratic alternatives.

Questions & Answers

Q: Did JD Vance provide a clear answer about whether he would have certified the election results?

No, Vance avoided directly answering the question and instead focused on the problems he perceived in the election, suggesting a political solution through litigating the legitimacy of slates of electors.

Q: Why does AB Stoddard find Vance's remarks concerning?

Stoddard is concerned that Vance's views promote autocracy and incite a constitutional crisis. She points out that his remarks are dangerous because they may appeal to voters who feel the democratic system is not working and are open to undemocratic alternatives.

Q: What specific issues does Vance mention regarding the 2020 election?

Vance highlights censorship by big tech companies and changes to ballot rules in Pennsylvania as problems during the 2020 election.

Q: How does Stoddard describe the state of the country?

Stoddard describes the country as being in a terrifying place, with a growing acceptance of authoritarianism, particularly among voters who feel disillusioned with the current political system.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• JD Vance argues that the 2020 election had multiple problems, including censorship by big tech companies and changes to ballot rules in Pennsylvania, and suggests that litigating the legitimacy of slates of electors is a reasonable political solution.

• He evades answering whether he would have certified the election results on January 6th if he were vice president, instead focusing on his belief that there were issues with the election and the need for a political solution.

• AB Stoddard expresses concern over Vance's views, stating that he is promoting autocracy and inciting a constitutional crisis, particularly among voters who feel disillusioned with the political system.