Robert Durst Evidentiary Hearing Part 2 12/21/16

TL;DR

During a court hearing, issues of conditional examination and waiver of attorney-client privilege were discussed, with a date set for the conditional examination despite objections from the defense.

Transcript

on the issue of whether or not he has Saed his attorney client privilege and third I will appoint a special Master to examine the seiz materials uh to uh examine them seal them and uh wait for the Court's instructions uh for their disposal or delivery and that is uh that for the purpose of uh protecting Mr dur uh privilege Communications and the pr... Read More

Key Insights

• 🦻 The court hearing involved discussions about the importance of conducting a conditional examination of witnesses and the need to preserve witness testimony.
• 🤨 The defense raised concerns about the lack of time to review the discovery materials and adequately prepare for the examination.
• ❓ The prosecution emphasized the potential unavailability of witnesses and argued for the examination to be conducted on February 14th.
• 📅 The court decided to tentatively schedule the examination for that date, pending objections from the defense.
• 🦻 The issues of conditional examination and waiver of attorney-client privilege were central to the hearing.
• 🛟 The prosecution sought to ensure that witness testimonies were preserved, while the defense highlighted the need for adequate time to review discovery materials and prepare for the examination.
• 📅 The court indicated a willingness to consider objections from the defense before finalizing the schedule for the conditional examination.

Questions & Answers

Q: What were the main issues discussed during the court hearing?

The main issues discussed were the conditional examination of witnesses and the waiver of attorney-client privilege.

Q: Why did the defense object to the proposed date for the conditional examination?

The defense objected to the proposed date because they felt that they did not have sufficient time to review the discovery materials and adequately prepare for the examination.

Q: Why did the prosecution argue for the conditional examination to be conducted on February 14th?

The prosecution argued for the examination to be conducted on February 14th in order to preserve witness testimony, particularly in the case of an 86-year-old witness who might become unavailable due to age or infirmity.

Q: What was the court's decision regarding the conditional examination?

The court tentatively scheduled the conditional examination for February 14th, pending objections from the defense.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The court hearing involved discussions about the conditional examination of witnesses and the waiver of attorney-client privilege.

• The defense expressed concerns about the lack of time to review the discovery materials and prepare for the examination.

• The prosecution argued for the need to conduct the conditional examination on February 14th and emphasized the importance of preserving witness testimony.

• The court decided to tentatively schedule the conditional examination for February 14th, pending objections from the defense.