Sean Phillips Trial (Phillips Mother Testifies) Day 2 Part 3 09/30/16

TL;DR

A witness is questioned about past testimony regarding the custody arrangement and relationship with the defendant in a missing child case.

Transcript

did you previously testify under an investigative subpoena in this matter yes all right and did you describe during the course that was under oath correct I'm sure it was correct all right and now was me asking the questions is that the one that was here at the courthouse yes yes and you remember asked being uh being asked to council page 31 invest... Read More

Key Insights

• 🏘️ The witness had a difficult relationship with the defendant and did not welcome them into their house.
• 👨 The witness had discussions about potential fathers but did not know who the father of the child was.
• 💀 The witness's son frequently talked negatively about the defendant.
• 👶 The witness had limited knowledge and interaction with the missing child.
• 💀 The witness testified that their son was surprised to be served with paternity papers.
• 💀 The witness attempted to contact their son after receiving messages from the defendant.
• 👻 The witness cooperated with the police and allowed them to search the house.

Questions & Answers

Q: Did the witness previously testify about the custody arrangement and relationship with the defendant?

Yes, the witness confirmed testifying about these matters under oath and described a difficult relationship and custody arrangement.

Q: Was the witness asked if they discussed potential fathers with their son?

Yes, the witness was asked about discussing potential fathers and confirmed that they wouldn't have known who the father was but had discussions about it.

Q: Did the witness testify about their son's negative comments about the defendant?

Yes, the witness testified that their son frequently talked negatively about the defendant for various reasons.

Q: Did the witness have any knowledge or interaction with the missing child?

No, the witness testified that they had not met the missing child and had limited interaction or knowledge about them.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The witness previously testified under oath regarding the custody arrangement and difficult relationship with the defendant.

• The witness confirmed that the defendant was not welcome at their house and that they had discussions about potential fathers.

• The witness admitted to not knowing the whereabouts of the granddaughter and having limited interaction with her.