The Sociological Perspective of Symbolic Struggle and the Intersection of Art and Society

The Sociological Perspective of Symbolic Struggle and the Intersection of Art and Society

Introduction:
In the book "The Sociological Perspective of Symbolic Struggle" (Communication Books, 2020), the author aimed to restore the connection between art and society and remember the artists who bravely confronted society through aesthetic practices. The concept of symbolic struggle in the book highlights how the aesthetic struggles of artists can serve as a driving force to dynamically reshape the social space. Symbolic struggle, as discussed by the author, goes beyond artistic practices and encompasses the recognition struggle performed between individuals within specific contexts. The outcomes of these recognition struggles within a particular context are automatically approved by the wider audience through a form of "misrecognition effect." The aesthetic recognition struggle of artists within the realm of art does not remain confined to autonomy and purity but exercises influence in the broader social space. Therefore, the aesthetic practices of artists involve some form of societal intervention. From the perspective of symbolic struggle, an artist's aesthetic practices are a struggle to obtain recognition both within and outside the artistic realm.

The Impact of "Autonomous Regulation" on Chinese and American Game Companies:
The implementation of "autonomous regulation" in China and the United States has unexpectedly benefited Chinese game companies, particularly in terms of in-app purchases made by domestic gamers. According to data analysis from mobile analytics platform Data.AI, 24% (1.7 trillion KRW) of the amount spent by Korean gamers on in-app purchases goes to Chinese game companies. This phenomenon has occurred because Korean gamers are attracted to the unique and exciting experiences provided by these Chinese game companies, disregarding domestic regulations. Furthermore, there is a high possibility that the punitive provisions of the revised regulations will be ignored by these companies. It is worth questioning whether the probability of this happening and their revenue share have any correlation.

Connecting the Dots:
Although seemingly unrelated, the sociological perspective of symbolic struggle in the context of art and the impact of "autonomous regulation" on Chinese and American game companies can be connected through the theme of recognition and societal influence. In both scenarios, the struggle for recognition is evident. In the context of symbolic struggle, artists engage in aesthetic practices to gain recognition within and outside the artistic realm. Their efforts aim to reshape the social space and influence society at large. Similarly, Chinese game companies, under the influence of "autonomous regulation," are vying for recognition in the Korean market through their unique and captivating gaming experiences. The revenue they generate from in-app purchases signifies the recognition they receive from Korean gamers. However, it is crucial to consider the ethical implications of disregarding domestic regulations and whether revenue share is the only indicator of success.

Unique Insights:
While the connection between symbolic struggle and the impact of "autonomous regulation" on game companies may not be immediately apparent, there are unique insights to be gained from exploring these topics side by side. One such insight is the notion that recognition, whether in the artistic realm or the gaming industry, is a powerful driving force for societal change. Artists use symbolism and aesthetic practices to challenge societal norms and reshape the social space, while game companies leverage unique experiences to gain recognition and influence consumer behavior. This parallel highlights the transformative power of recognition and the potential for artists and game developers to drive social change.

Actionable Advice:

1. Embrace the Power of Symbolism: As an artist or creative professional, recognize the potential of symbolism in your work. Utilize aesthetic practices to challenge societal norms, reshape the social space, and promote positive change.

2. Ethical Considerations in the Gaming Industry: If you are a game developer or involved in the gaming industry, consider the ethical implications of disregarding domestic regulations. Strive to create unique and captivating gaming experiences while ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

3. Foster Dialogue and Collaboration: Encourage dialogue and collaboration between artists, game developers, and sociologists. By bridging these disciplines, we can gain a deeper understanding of the intersection of art, society, and the influence of aesthetic practices in shaping societal norms and values.

Conclusion:
The sociological perspective of symbolic struggle provides valuable insights into the intersection of art and society, highlighting the transformative power of aesthetic practices. Similarly, the impact of "autonomous regulation" on Chinese and American game companies demonstrates the significance of recognition in driving societal change. By recognizing the common theme of recognition and societal influence, we can appreciate the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated fields and promote dialogue and collaboration among artists, game developers, and sociologists. Through understanding and action, we can harness the power of symbolism and aesthetic practices to foster positive social change.