๐Ÿš€ Is AI art ethical? The Near Future of AI is Action-Driven.

Kazuki Nakayashiki

Hatched by Kazuki Nakayashiki

Aug 09, 2023

4 min read

0

๐Ÿš€ Is AI art ethical? The Near Future of AI is Action-Driven.

When it comes to AI art, there are two main arguments used by opponents. The first argument is that AI art is considered "soulless" because the creator provides guidance on the content and style of the image, but isn't actually creating it. Proponents of this argument believe that what gives meaning to art is the countless little decisions made by a human in the process of designing a piece. They argue that emotions and motivation are critical in creating art, which AI lacks. Therefore, according to this perspective, AI-generated art cannot be considered true art.

On the other hand, proponents of AI art argue that it is not soulless, but rather a democratization of access to art. AI is trained on millions of images of real art, allowing more people to create art and feel fulfilled as artists. They believe that the result will be more art in the world, expanding the possibilities of artistic expression.

Another argument against AI art is that it steals from "real" artists. However, it can be argued that almost everything created today is somehow inspired by something else. In the real world, artists often play off of or imitate each other's work. Pablo Picasso once reportedly said, "good artists copy, great artists steal." This idea raises the question of whether it is "theft" to be inspired by other people's inspiration.

To address the concerns of theft and originality in AI art, the concept of NFTs (non-fungible tokens) comes into play. By publishing individual pieces of art as NFTs, there is a record of who originally generated it. Even if someone creates an identical piece, the original creator can be recognized and credited.

Moving beyond the realm of AI art, the near future of AI is action-driven. The ReAct model, which takes into account thought, act, and observation, shows the potential of AI acting as an agent choosing actions. This action-driven approach aligns closely with the concept of artificial general intelligence (AGI), as the model begins to resemble AGI in its decision-making capabilities.

LLMs (large language models) have shown that they perform better at question-answering tasks when prompted to "think step by step." However, they can achieve even greater results when given external cognitive assets. These external resources, such as fetching data from external spaces, bridge the resource gap and enhance the performance of LLMs.

OpenAI's 002-text-davinci model has demonstrated the power of instruction tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). By having humans rate the success of a given prompt, the model can learn and improve its outputs. However, the potential for actual reinforcement learning, where a system can be trained to produce better results based on a specific metric of interest, holds even greater promise.

In the future, startups that successfully create powerful feedback loops will thrive in the AI landscape. By solving customer pain points, collecting data to improve their solutions, and iterating on their models, these startups will establish a strong competitive advantage. This iterative process will be the foundation of a moat in the field of AI, at least for now.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding the ethics of AI art continues. While opponents argue that AI art lacks the soul and originality of human-created art, proponents believe that it democratizes access to art and expands artistic expression. As AI progresses, the future of AI lies in its action-driven capabilities, resembling AGI. Incorporating external cognitive assets and reinforcement learning will further enhance the potential of AI. To succeed in the AI landscape, startups must focus on creating powerful feedback loops and iterating on their models. The possibilities for AI are vast, and as it becomes more domain-general, the potential for automation and new offerings will continue to expand.

Actionable advice:

  1. Embrace the possibilities of AI art: Instead of viewing AI art as a threat or a soulless imitation, embrace the potential it brings for new forms of artistic expression and accessibility.
  2. Explore external cognitive assets: If you're working with AI models or language models, consider incorporating external cognitive assets to enhance their performance and bridge any resource gaps.
  3. Harness the power of feedback loops: Whether you're a startup or an individual working with AI, focus on creating feedback loops that allow for continuous improvement. Collect data, iterate on your models, and strive for better results based on specific metrics of interest.

By considering the arguments surrounding AI art and envisioning the future of AI as action-driven, we can navigate the ethical considerations and harness the potential of AI in a responsible and impactful way.

Sources

โ† Back to Library

Hatch New Ideas with Glasp AI ๐Ÿฃ

Glasp AI allows you to hatch new ideas based on your curated content. Let's curate and create with Glasp AI :)

Start Hatching ๐Ÿฃ