The Struggle for Notability: Wikipedia's Battle with Creators and OpenAI's Vision for AGI

Glasp

Hatched by Glasp

Aug 14, 2023

3 min read

0

The Struggle for Notability: Wikipedia's Battle with Creators and OpenAI's Vision for AGI

Introduction:

In the digital age, where information is readily accessible, two key issues have emerged - the struggle to define notability on Wikipedia and the potential impact of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) on society. Both topics raise questions about credibility, gatekeeping, and the future of knowledge sharing. This article aims to explore the commonalities between these two issues and their implications for creators and the wider society.

Defining Notability on Wikipedia:

Wikipedia, the world's largest online encyclopedia, grapples with the challenge of determining notability for its contributors. The subjectivity of this notion becomes evident as the border between a "reliable" secondary source and an arbitrary one blurs. Additionally, the credibility of publications varies across countries. The reliance on reputable secondary media coverage as a criterion for notability raises concerns about the exclusion of creators whose achievements are primarily recognized within specific communities or platforms. The lack of coverage by mainstream publications further exacerbates this issue, as Wikipedia often dismisses niche media outlets as unreliable sources. The struggle to define notability on Wikipedia highlights the need for a more inclusive and comprehensive approach to recognizing creators' contributions.

Creators and their Notability:

Content creators, particularly in the influencer space, establish their own notability through their content and the impact they have on their audience. Research indicates that consumers trust influencer product recommendations more than celebrity endorsements. However, the system of notability on Wikipedia fails to adequately capture the influence and reach of these creators. As the Creator Revolution gains momentum, it becomes crucial to reassess how creators fit into the documentation of history and knowledge. The current gatekeeping structure, dominated by a predominantly male group of editors, calls for a more inclusive approach that embraces the diversity of creators and their impact on society.

OpenAI's Perspective on AGI:

OpenAI, a leading organization in the field of artificial intelligence, envisions a future where AGI could potentially "break capitalism." While AGI remains a distant possibility, the organization acknowledges the need for new thinking in terms of sharing profits, access, and governance. OpenAI's unique corporate structure reflects its commitment to responsible AI development. However, if AGI becomes a reality, reevaluating the current structure becomes imperative. The concentration of AI power in the hands of a single company would hinder the equitable distribution of benefits and governance. OpenAI's approach to pushing the Overton Window on AGI reflects its commitment to engaging in healthy and important conversations around the societal implications of this technology.

Common Ground and Future Implications:

Both Wikipedia's struggle with notability and OpenAI's vision for AGI raise important questions about the future of knowledge sharing and societal structures. Notability on Wikipedia should adapt to recognize the impact of creators beyond mainstream media coverage, while AGI demands a reassessment of existing systems to ensure equitable distribution and governance. To address these challenges, three actionable advice points can be considered:

  • 1. Redefining notability: Wikipedia should embrace a more comprehensive approach to acknowledge creators' impact, considering their reach within specific communities and platforms.
  • 2. Collaborative governance: As AGI development progresses, stakeholders should engage in conversations about shared profits, access, and governance to ensure the technology's benefits are widely distributed.
  • 3. Responsible AI development: Companies building on AI technologies must share responsibility and be accountable for potential negative implications, fostering a joint effort to minimize harm and ensure ethical use.

Conclusion:

The struggle for notability on Wikipedia and the potential impact of AGI highlight the need for ongoing dialogue and adaptation in the digital age. Recognizing creators' contributions and reimagining systems to foster equitable distribution and governance of transformative technologies will shape the future of knowledge sharing and societal structures. As we navigate these challenges, embracing inclusivity, collaboration, and responsible AI development will be key to creating a more equitable and informed world.

Hatch New Ideas with Glasp AI 🐣

Glasp AI allows you to hatch new ideas based on your curated content. Let's curate and create with Glasp AI :)