Navigating Evaluation and Agency through Theory-Based Approaches and Decolonial Feminisms

Navigating Evaluation and Agency through Theory-Based Approaches and Decolonial Feminisms

In the contemporary landscape of research and evaluation, the interplay between theory-based approaches and the assertion of agency within narrative methodologies is increasingly significant. As societies evolve, so too do the frameworks through which we assess programs, policies, and practices. The importance of integrating diverse perspectives, particularly those rooted in decolonial feminisms, offers a fresh lens through which to view evaluation practices. This article delves into the concepts and practices of theory-based approaches to evaluation while exploring the potential of narrative productions to empower marginalized voices.

Theory-based evaluation is anchored in the understanding that all evaluations are influenced by underlying assumptions and theories about how change occurs. This method emphasizes the need for a clear articulation of the program's theory of change, which outlines the causal relationships between activities, outputs, and desired outcomes. By leveraging a theory-based framework, evaluators can better understand not just what works, but why it works, allowing for a more nuanced approach to program assessment.

In parallel, the narrative productions methodology offers a compelling avenue for enhancing agency among participants. This qualitative approach centers on the stories and experiences of individuals, particularly those from marginalized communities. By prioritizing narrative, researchers can reveal the complexities of lived experiences that often go unrecognized in traditional evaluation frameworks. This is particularly relevant in the context of decolonial feminisms, which advocate for the inclusion of diverse voices and the dismantling of hegemonic narratives that have historically silenced certain groups.

The convergence of theory-based evaluation and narrative methodologies can create a more holistic understanding of impact. Evaluators who integrate narrative methods into their assessments can capture the subtleties of change that quantitative measures might overlook. This synergy not only enriches the evaluation process but also empowers participants by validating their experiences and insights. In doing so, it aligns with the principles of decolonial feminisms, which seek to challenge and transform dominant paradigms within research and evaluation.

Moreover, the promise of agency within narrative productions is particularly salient. By allowing individuals to craft and share their own stories, researchers foster an environment where participants reclaim their narratives and assert their identities. This process is vital for those from marginalized backgrounds, as it enables them to articulate their realities in ways that resonate with their lived experiences. The implications for evaluation are profound; when individuals are positioned as active agents in their stories, the resulting evaluations are likely to be more relevant, culturally sensitive, and impactful.

To effectively harness the potential of theory-based approaches and narrative methodologies in evaluation, practitioners can consider the following actionable strategies:

• 1. Engage Stakeholders Early: Involve participants and stakeholders in the development of the evaluation framework from the outset. This ensures that the evaluation resonates with their experiences and expectations, thereby enhancing buy-in and relevance.

• 2. Train Evaluators in Narrative Techniques: Equip evaluators with the skills necessary to conduct narrative-based evaluations. This includes training in qualitative methods, active listening, and cultural competency, allowing them to better appreciate and analyze the stories shared by participants.

• 3. Iterate and Reflect: Foster a culture of reflection throughout the evaluation process. Encourage evaluators to regularly revisit and revise their theories of change based on emerging narratives and feedback, ensuring that the evaluation remains responsive to the evolving context of the program.

In conclusion, the integration of theory-based approaches to evaluation with narrative methodologies presents a promising pathway for enhancing understanding and agency in research practices. By valuing the stories of individuals and grounding evaluation in robust theoretical frameworks, we can create a more inclusive and effective landscape for assessment. The journey toward more equitable evaluation practices is ongoing, but through these strategies, we can take meaningful steps toward embracing the complexities of human experience and the diverse narratives that shape our understanding of impact.