The Evolution of Scoping Reviews: From Mapping Reviews to Systematic Scoping Reviews

The Evolution of Scoping Reviews: From Mapping Reviews to Systematic Scoping Reviews

Introduction:
Scoping reviews, also known as mapping reviews or scoping studies, have become an integral part of evidence synthesis in various fields. Originally introduced by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005, the concept of scoping reviews has evolved over time, leading to the development of rigorous and transparent methodologies. This article delves into the history of scoping review development, explores the concept of consumption and consumer culture in relation to scoping reviews, and provides actionable advice for conducting effective scoping reviews.

The Evolution of Scoping Reviews:
Arksey and O'Malley's original framework in 2005 laid the foundation for scoping reviews. This framework aimed to map the existing literature on a particular topic, identifying the key concepts, sources, and gaps in knowledge. However, it was Levac and colleagues in 2010 who extended this framework, introducing a more systematic approach to scoping reviews. Their guidance emphasized the importance of transparency and trustworthiness in the scoping review process.

The Role of JBI and JBIC:
The scoping review methodology received further refinement and recognition through the efforts of the JBI and JBIC. Peters et al. in 2015 and 2017 proposed the term "systematic scoping review" to highlight the need for systematic conduct in all types of knowledge synthesis. Over time, this term was simplified to "scoping reviews" to encompass the wide range of knowledge synthesis approaches. Additionally, the PRISMA-ScR (Systematic Reviews) Statement was developed by experts in scoping reviews and evidence synthesis, including members of the JBI/JBIC working group.

Consumer Culture and Scoping Reviews:
In the Journal of Consumer Culture, the relationship between consumption and consumer culture is extensively explored. This field opens up debates and areas of exploration that intersect with scoping reviews. Scoping reviews can provide valuable insights into consumer behaviors, societal trends, and the impact of consumer culture on various aspects of society. Incorporating the study of consumer culture within scoping reviews can enhance the understanding of consumption patterns and their implications.

Actionable Advice for Conducting Effective Scoping Reviews:

1. Clearly Define the Research Question: When embarking on a scoping review, it is crucial to have a well-defined research question. This will guide the entire process, ensuring that the review remains focused and relevant.

2. Comprehensive Search Strategy: To ensure inclusivity and thoroughness, develop a comprehensive search strategy that encompasses multiple databases and sources. Additionally, consider consulting experts in the field to identify any potentially relevant studies that may not be indexed in traditional databases.

3. Transparent Reporting: Transparency is key in scoping reviews. Adhere to established reporting guidelines, such as the PRISMA-ScR, to ensure that the review process and findings are documented clearly and comprehensively.

Conclusion:
Scoping reviews have come a long way since their inception, evolving from mapping reviews to systematic scoping reviews. The incorporation of consumer culture studies within scoping reviews adds depth and relevance to the field. By following the actionable advice provided, researchers can conduct effective scoping reviews that contribute to the body of knowledge and inform evidence-based decision-making.