The War on Ivermectin: Bret Speaks with Pierre Kory on the Darkhorse Podcast

TL;DR

The pharmaceutical industry, in collusion with government agencies, media, and medical journals, has successfully suppressed the use of Ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID-19, leading to devastating consequences for healthcare professionals who have advocated for its use.

Transcript

I had no idea when I stood up what was going to happen I literally thought like when you talk about the testimony Brett I mean I thought the the science the review that we had done was going to be warmly embraced like I actually literally was trembling I felt like Ivermectin would be deployed in this systematic prevention and treatment of covid wor... Read More

Key Insights

• 😷 The pharmaceutical industry has successfully manipulated medical science, including the suppression of alternative treatments like Ivermectin, to prioritize profit over patient care.
• 😷 The collusion between pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, media outlets, and medical journals has allowed for the control and distortion of scientific research and data.
• 😷 The suppression of Ivermectin is emblematic of a larger systemic issue within the medical field, undermining the integrity and trustworthiness of medical research.
• 😀 Doctors face significant consequences, including professional ruin, for advocating for alternative treatments that challenge the pharmaceutical industry's narrative.

Questions & Answers

Q: What were the consequences faced by Dr. Pierre Corey for advocating the use of Ivermectin?

Dr. Corey lost three jobs, was ostracized from academic medicine, and faced significant professional and personal challenges as a result of his advocacy for Ivermectin.

Q: Is the suppression of Ivermectin part of a broader pattern of influence and control by the pharmaceutical industry?

Yes, the episode exposes the extensive control that pharmaceutical companies exert over government agencies, media outlets, and medical journals, highlighting a systemic issue in the medical field.

Q: How did the pharmaceutical industry manipulate clinical trials for Ivermectin?

The industry strategically designed trials, selectively reported data, and set predetermined outcomes to create a false narrative that Ivermectin was ineffective or unsafe, thus discouraging its use as a treatment for COVID-19.

Q: Why are healthcare professionals hesitant to question the narrative around repurposed drugs like Ivermectin?

Many doctors and scientists have been conditioned to trust medical journals and institutions, leading them to believe the narrative presented without critically examining the evidence. Fear of professional repercussions also plays a role in their silence.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Dr. Pierre Corey recounts his experience of standing up for the potential use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 and the subsequent loss of his academic career.

• The episode highlights the collaboration between pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, media outlets, and medical journals to control the narrative and discredit alternative treatments.

• Pharmaceutical influence has permeated medical science and led to the manipulation of clinical trials, suppression of data, and the misrepresentation of efficacy, undermining the integrity of medical research.