Day 9 - John Lewin Cross Examines Robert Durst For The Murder of Friend Susan Berman Part 33

TL;DR

Robert Durst's conflicting statements lead to credibility issues in the case.

Transcript

all right welcome back ladies and gentlemen thank you for uh returning promptly we all jurors and alternates are present mr durst is here with mr agueron and mr chesnov mr lewis i saw mr lewis is in the back and we have mr lew and mr bailey and mr elias mr miana mr henderson last but not least mr timothy henderson you may resume your examination of... Read More

Key Insights

• 🎟️ Durst's contradictory statements and admissions of perjury create credibility issues.
• ❓ The audio of Durst saying "kill them all" poses a significant challenge to his defense.
• 🤨 Confusion and contradictions surrounding bow saw purchases raise suspicion about his involvement in Morris Black's case.
• 💨 Durst's attempts to explain away incriminating evidence may not be convincing to the jury.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why did Robert Durst purchase multiple bow saws in proximity to Morris Black's murder and dismemberment?

Durst claims the first saw was from Morris's closet, the second from New Orleans, while denying a purchase at a crucial time. The ambiguity raises suspicions about his involvement in the crimes.

Q: How does Durst's admission to perjury impact his credibility in the case?

Durst's admission to five instances of perjury and his intent to lie about critical issues like the murder of Susan Berman undermine his credibility, making it difficult to determine the truth in his testimony.

Q: What incriminating statements did Durst make while discussing the evidence against him?

Durst's statements in the bathroom audio, like saying "kill them all," are highly incriminating and demonstrate potential guilt, despite his attempts to provide explanations for these statements.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Robert Durst faces questions about his bow saw purchases and usage in the dismemberment of Morris Black.

• Contradictions in Durst's testimony point to potential perjury and incriminating statements.

• Durst admits to past perjury and struggles with addressing key evidence against him.