New Witness Says Daniel Penny Is A HERO, Saved Their Lives On Train

TL;DR

A witness praises Marine veteran Daniel Penny for his heroic actions in restraining a threatening individual, while criticizing the Manhattan District Attorney for prosecuting him.

Transcript

jump into this first story we have this from Fox News witness to Jordan nearly Chokehold death calls Daniel penny a hero NYC passenger says Marine vet cared for people and that is his crime the funny thing is that's literally a crime these days caring for others in New York City especially they say a retiree who witnessed the Fatal choking incident... Read More

Key Insights

• 🥹 The witness testimony contradicts the claim that Penny continued to hold the individual after he had stopped moving.
• 😑 Support for Penny's actions comes from passengers on the train who express gratitude and consider him a hero.
• 💼 The witness criticizes the Manhattan DA for prosecuting Penny, suggesting that regular New Yorkers do not support criminal charges in this case.
• 😀 The incident highlights the need for individuals to protect themselves and others in the face of violent behavior, despite potential legal repercussions.
• 😑 The witness expresses nostalgia for the "law and order" of Giuliani's era, highlighting the current lack of protection from violent individuals.
• 👻 The media's focus on individuals defending themselves against criminals reinforces the idea that citizens should not resist and should allow themselves to be victimized.
• 😥 The witness points out the dangers faced by average New Yorkers due to mentally unstable individuals in the subway.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why does the witness consider Daniel Penny a hero?

The witness believes that Penny acted in self-defense and protected others from a potentially dangerous situation. She praises him for his caring nature and believes he saved lives that day.

Q: Are there any negative opinions about Penny's actions?

The witness states that no one on the train has come forward to criticize Penny's actions. Only a fringe group of protesters and the Manhattan DA have criticized him, while the average New Yorker recognizes the need for individuals to protect themselves and others.

Q: Was Penny's restraint excessive?

According to the witness, Penny was not aggressively attacking the individual but rather trying to prevent further harm. As a Marine veteran, he likely knew how to subdue someone without causing severe harm. The witness suggests there may have been other factors contributing to the individual's death.

Q: Why does the witness think this incident is not about race?

The witness emphasizes that the incident is not about race but about the fear and potential harm faced by people of all colors on the train. The focus should be on the heroic actions of Penny and the need for self-defense.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• A retiree witness describes Daniel Penny as a hero for coming to the defense of fellow passengers during a choking incident, but criticizes the Manhattan DA for charging him.

• Multiple passengers on the train express gratitude towards Penny for his actions, indicating that they felt threatened by the individual being restrained.

• Despite widespread support for Penny, prosecutor Joshua Steinglass claims that Penny continued to hold the individual even after he had stopped moving, a statement contradicted by the witness who saw the individual still moving and being restrained by other men.