Justin Ross Harris Trial Juror #20 Questioned 09/22/16

TL;DR

Juror's past Facebook posts scrutinized for bias, raises concerns in trial.

Transcript

you know I had a very emotional reaction I told you okay okay I think I have said that I don't necessarily did not what return it to just this particular case yes okay something in general okay now tell me this Facebook page this page actually has that you're talking about that you joined it has documents on it regarding the case correct okay do yo... Read More

Key Insights

• 🤨 The juror's past Facebook posts raised concerns about potential bias in the ongoing trial.
• 😑 Juror's credibility and honesty were questioned regarding their strong opinions expressed in the past.
• 😫 The juror's ability to set aside personal beliefs and be impartial in the trial became a subject of scrutiny.
• 🍝 Legal implications of past social media activity on juror selection and trial proceedings came into focus.
• ✋ The importance of transparency and candor from jurors in high-profile cases was highlighted.
• ❓ Strategic decisions made by defense counsel regarding juror selection impacted trial dynamics.
• 🍝 Juror's emotional reactions and life experiences influenced their past opinions, reflecting on their potential objectivity in the trial.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why was the juror questioned about their Facebook posts?

The juror was asked about their past Facebook posts because they expressed strong opinions related to the ongoing trial, raising concerns about bias.

Q: What were some of the opinions expressed by the juror on Facebook?

The juror's past posts indicated a belief that forgetting a child in a car is equivalent to murder, showing a clear stance on the case.

Q: How did the juror justify their past strong opinions?

The juror mentioned reading about a father's tragic incident, which influenced their viewpoint, but also admitted to an emotional reaction to the case.

Q: How did the juror respond to questions about their honesty and potential bias?

The juror maintained honesty about not fully remembering their past posts but expressed willingness to be fair in the trial proceedings and reassess their opinions.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Juror questioned about strong opinions expressed on Facebook regarding a case.

• Posts from 2014 resurface, expressing belief that forgetting is akin to murder.

• Juror's honesty and credibility under scrutiny in ongoing trial.