SCOTUS DESTROYS Democrat Lawyer Over Colorado Removing Trump From Ballot

TL;DR

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on whether Donald Trump can be removed from the ballot under the 14th Amendment, with many suggesting it may end in a unanimous ruling against his removal.

Transcript

the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over the issue of Donald Trump being removed from the ballot on the under under the 14th Amendment section three did you guys listen to the oral arguments uh not all of it but like half yeah holy crap the Democrat lawyer was getting spanked by all of them and many are suggesting it was so bad it might be a una... Read More

Key Insights

• 🥺 The Supreme Court appears likely to reject attempts to remove Donald Trump from the ballot, potentially leading to a definitive ruling in his favor.
• 🇺🇸 Arguments focused on whether the presidency is considered an office under the United States and whether Congress must act before states can invoke a constitutional provision.
• 👻 If the presidency is covered by the 14th Amendment, it would also exempt the president from the Emoluments Clause, allowing them to enrich themselves through the office.

Questions & Answers

Q: What were the main arguments presented in the Supreme Court regarding Trump's removal from the ballot?

The main arguments focused on whether the presidency is considered an office under the United States and whether Congress must act before states can invoke a constitutional provision to prevent former office holders who engaged in insurrection from holding office again.

Q: Who seemed to have the upper hand during the oral arguments?

According to the speaker, the Democrat lawyer was getting heavily criticized by the justices, especially Justice Gorsuch, suggesting that Trump may not be removed from the ballot.

Q: How does the interpretation of the 14th Amendment affect the Emoluments Clause?

If the Supreme Court determines that the presidency is covered by the 14th Amendment, it would mean that the president is exempt from the Emoluments Clause, allowing them to enrich themselves through the office.

Q: What is the rationale behind not explicitly including the president in the 14th Amendment?

The speaker argues that the reason the president is not explicitly included in the 14th Amendment is that the Electoral College and the voting system allow for the selection and rejection of a president who may be an insurrectionist.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The Supreme Court seems likely to reject attempts to remove Donald Trump from the ballot, putting an end to efforts in several states.

• Key concerns during the arguments were whether Congress must act before states can invoke a constitutional provision to prevent former office holders who engaged in insurrection from holding office again, and whether the president is covered by this provision.

• Trump's lawyers argued that the presidency is not an office under the United States, which would also exempt the president from the Emoluments Clause.