Michael Slager Trial Discussing Answers to Jury Questions 12/05/16

TL;DR

Detailed legal instruction review for criminal case, addressing various aspects and definitions.

Transcript

Oh computer should Oh huh ok alright i received a proposal from both sides and an interview the each other's proposal two and all right your honor you're right alright so state as to the first question we have no objection to the verse says it is a lesser offense murder he may consider it the question the jury asked was why not necessarily what I t... Read More

Key Insights

• 💼 Detailed review of legal definitions and instructions for a criminal case.
• 💼 Inclusion of specific language from previous cases like Starnes for clarity.
• 💀 Emphasis on addressing self-defense, legal provocation, and imminent danger in jury instructions.

Questions & Answers

Q: What legal aspects were being reviewed in the criminal case?

The legal aspects under review included self-defense, legal provocation, imminent danger, and jury instructions, with both sides suggesting clarifications and additions.

Q: Why was the Starnes case language proposed to be included in the instructions?

The Starnes case language was suggested for inclusion to provide a more thorough explanation on legal provocation and passion, addressing a specific question raised by the jury.

Q: How was the issue of imminent danger addressed in the legal instruction review?

The definition of imminent danger was deliberated upon by referencing Black's Law Dictionary, with both sides proposing language to supplement existing instructions without contradicting them.

Q: What approach was taken to consolidate the requested legal instructions?

The court aimed to merge the proposed instructions from both sides, excluding certain elements already covered, and create a comprehensive single instruction for the jury.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Review and clarifications requested on different legal aspects and definitions by both sides in a criminal case.

• Questions raised on self-defense, legal provocation, imminent danger, and jury instructions.

• Suggestions made to include specific language from Starnes case for a comprehensive instruction.