India's take on BBC's Modi documentary

TL;DR

The Indian government dismisses the BBC documentary on the Gujarat riots as propaganda and questions its purpose and intentions.

Transcript

which report so you may be aware that BBC has recently broadcast a documentary a longish documentary on the Gujarat rights which also says that Narendra Modi was the perpetrator of ethnic cleansing now this is based on a secret document that apparently question has come from we are just to explain to you has come from the foreign office from 2002. ... Read More

Key Insights

• 🖤 The Indian government dismisses the BBC documentary on the Gujarat riots as a propaganda piece lacking objectivity.
• ❓ They believe the documentary reflects a continuing colonial mindset.
• 🚂 The Indian government questions the motives behind the creation of the documentary.
• ❓ They refuse to dignify the documentary with a response.
• 🚠 The Indian government does not confirm or deny the reported internal cable by the UK government.
• 🥶 They argue that the reported cable refers to a 20-year-old document and question its legitimacy.
• 🇮🇴 The Indian government suggests that any legal action regarding UK citizens' deaths should follow proper legal procedures.

Questions & Answers

Q: How has the Indian government responded to the BBC documentary on the Gujarat riots?

The Indian government considers the documentary to be propaganda, lacking objectivity and promoting a discredited narrative. They believe it reflects a continuing colonial mindset and question the purpose and intentions behind its creation.

Q: Why label the documentary as propaganda if it hasn't been viewed in India?

Despite not being aired in India, the Indian government claims to have access to information about the documentary. They have seen it and believe it to be a propaganda piece based on their assessment.

Q: Does India confirm or deny the existence of the reported internal cable by the UK government?

The Indian government argues that they cannot confirm or deny the report as it refers to a 20-year-old internal UK document. They question the legitimacy of the report and dismiss it as part of a colonial mindset.

Q: Did the UK government ever raise the issue of UK citizens of Indian origin being killed during the Gujarat riots?

The Indian government questions why the UK government would make a diplomatic case for the deaths of UK citizens. They believe it is not their responsibility and suggest that any legal action should be pursued through the proper channels.

Key Insights:

• The Indian government dismisses the BBC documentary on the Gujarat riots as a propaganda piece lacking objectivity.
• They believe the documentary reflects a continuing colonial mindset.
• The Indian government questions the motives behind the creation of the documentary.
• They refuse to dignify the documentary with a response.
• The Indian government does not confirm or deny the reported internal cable by the UK government.
• They argue that the reported cable refers to a 20-year-old document and question its legitimacy.
• The Indian government suggests that any legal action regarding UK citizens' deaths should follow proper legal procedures.
• They emphasize that deaths in India during the riots have been subject to legal processes.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The Indian government believes the BBC documentary is a propaganda piece, lacking objectivity and promoting a discredited narrative.

• The documentary alleges that Narendra Modi was involved in ethnic cleansing during the Gujarat riots.

• The Indian government refuses to dignify the documentary with a response and questions the motives behind its creation.