Trial Partners: Keith Mitnik & Matt Morgan

TL;DR

Attorneys Matt Morgan and Keith Mitnik are revolutionizing the case evaluation process, emphasizing the true harms and losses suffered by their clients.

Transcript

Matt Morgan: What’s happening with what Keith and I are doing right now is we’re changing the landscape of the case evaluation process. Attorneys and insurance companies and adjusters, they’re all accustomed to certain cases having certain values, but what we’re finding is that their evaluation system is skewed, it’s off, it’s not right. It doesn’t... Read More

Key Insights

• 🥺 The case evaluation process often fails to consider the long-term physical and emotional impact on victims, leading to undervalued claims.
• 😃 Matt Morgan and Keith Mitnik educate juries about the loss of joy and diminished life experiences, shifting perspectives towards fair compensation.
• 💁 Their approach does not involve manipulation but rather aims to inform and create empathy among jurors.

Questions & Answers

Q: How are Matt Morgan and Keith Mitnik changing the case evaluation process?

Morgan and Mitnik are challenging the traditional system that undervalues claims by emphasizing the long-term physical and emotional impact on victims. They believe that the evaluation process needs to consider more than just medical bills.

Q: How do they persuade juries to recognize the true damages suffered by their clients?

Morgan and Mitnik educate jurors on the loss of joy and diminished life experience caused by the defendant's actions. They use relatable analogies and personal narratives to help juries understand the long-lasting effects of the injuries.

Q: Do their high verdicts suggest manipulation of jurors?

The attorneys refute claims of trickery, emphasizing that their results come from educating jurors about the justice in recognizing the true impact of the harm caused. They believe in doing the right thing and changing perspectives without unfair manipulation.

Q: How do they address the skepticism of jurors who may not understand the extent of the injuries?

Morgan and Mitnik explain the constant presence of pain and discomfort endured by their clients, using analogies of everyday situations to help jurors grasp the psychological burden their clients carry. They aim to create empathy and understanding.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Matt Morgan and Keith Mitnik are challenging the skewed evaluation system used by attorneys, insurance companies, and adjusters.

• They argue that the current system fails to consider the long-term physical and emotional impact on victims, resulting in undervalued claims.

• By highlighting the profound loss of joy and overall diminished life experience, they aim to secure favorable verdicts for their clients and change the way cases are evaluated.