Hillary’s Pragmatic, Capable, and Competent. So Why Doesn't America Trust Her? | Big Think

TL;DR

Hillary Clinton's foreign policy as Secretary of State is pragmatic, focused on value for investment, not values or democracy.

Transcript

Hillary Clinton given her Secretary of State record has a very significant foreign policy record that we can actually look at. And I’d say as Secretary of State she comes down fairly strongly as a moneyball America candidate. I mean really focusing without sentimentality on where America gets value for investment. It’s not about values. It’s not ab... Read More

Key Insights

• 💋 Hillary Clinton's foreign policy as Secretary of State was marked by strategic investments and pragmatism.
• 🌏 She focused on Asia, crafted the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and avoided Middle East entanglements.
• 🍝 As a candidate, Hillary seems to shift from past policies for political reasons rather than policy considerations.
• ❓ Hillary's competency and experience in foreign policy are acknowledged, but trust and authenticity remain concerns.
• 🧔‍♀️ There may be a gender bias in perceiving women politicians' authenticity compared to men, affecting public trust in Hillary.
• 🖤 Lack of transparency in her campaign strategy may be a political move but could impact her perceived leadership qualities.
• 🇨🇫 Public perception of Hillary's authenticity and trustworthiness may influence her electoral chances.

Questions & Answers

Q: What defines Hillary Clinton's foreign policy approach?

Hillary's approach is marked by prioritizing strategic value for America through investments and pragmatism, focusing on tangible outcomes rather than ideological values.

Q: How did Hillary handle foreign policy challenges like Libya and Russia?

In Libya, she reluctantly supported limited military actions with a focus on precision and no nation-building post-engagement. She initiated a reset with Russia to shift focus from past conflicts.

Q: What is the transition in Hillary's stance from Secretary of State to presidential candidate?

As a candidate, Hillary seems to distance herself from past foreign policies like the Iran deal, Syria risk aversion, and Russia reset, seemingly for political gains.

Q: How does public perception impact Hillary's authenticity in foreign policy matters?

There may be a double standard in perceiving women's authenticity in politics, impacting public trust in Hillary despite her competency and experience in foreign policy.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Hillary Clinton's foreign policy was moneyball America focused on strategic investments with low sentimentality.

• She pivoted to Asia and crafted the Trans-Pacific Partnership, avoiding Middle East entanglements.

• However, her campaign strategy seems to distance herself from previous policies for political reasons.