A WILDERNESS OF STARS BY SHEA EARNSHAW BOOK REVIEW [with and without spoilers]!!!

TL;DR

A reviewer discusses the pros and cons of Shea Earnshaw's novel, A Wilderness of Stars, including the book's mysterious plot and questionable scientific aspects.

Transcript

hey there my name is Megan and welcome to my channel [Applause] today I'm going to be doing a book review for a Wilderness of stars by Shea arnshaw but before we go ahead and get on into the review if you are not already subscribed to my Channel please go ahead and hit that subscribe Button as well as the little bell icon so you can be notified eve... Read More

Key Insights

• 💦 A Wilderness of Stars features elegant prose and atmospheric descriptions, reminiscent of the author's previous work, The Wicked Deep.
• 💁 The book's mystery elements and slow revelation of information kept the reviewer engaged and invested in the story.
• ⁉️ The inclusion of the antagonist, Hoyt, was questioned, as his motivations seemed unclear and unnecessary to the overall plot.
• 💁 The pacing of the book was criticized for being slow, but intermittent tidbits of information provided enough intrigue to keep the reviewer reading.
• 🫥 The scientific believability of elements like a visible black hole and the survival of a planet passing through it were met with skepticism and questions about their accuracy.

Questions & Answers

Q: What is the main premise of A Wilderness of Stars?

A Wilderness of Stars follows Vega, the last astronomer, as she embarks on a journey to save her dying world by finding a cure guided by celestial omens.

Q: How did the reviewer feel about the book's prose?

The reviewer appreciated Shea Earnshaw's prose, describing it as lovely and atmospheric, although at times it felt slightly overdone and purpley.

Q: What were the reviewer's thoughts on the book's mystery?

The reviewer enjoyed the mystery aspect of the book, with hints sprinkled throughout to keep readers engaged and eager to uncover the final revelation.

Q: What criticism did the reviewer have about the inclusion of the antagonist, Hoyt?

The reviewer felt that Hoyt, the antagonist, did not add anything significant to the story and questioned his motivations, as they seemed illogical and unnecessary.

Q: How did the reviewer feel about the pacing of the book?

The reviewer found the pacing slow, especially during the initial three-quarters of the book, but acknowledged that intermittent tidbits of information kept them interested.

Q: What scientific aspect of the book did the reviewer struggle with?

The reviewer questioned the believability of a visible black hole in the story, as their understanding of black holes suggested that they cannot be seen directly.

Q: How did the reviewer feel about the ending?

The reviewer struggled with the ending, particularly the idea that a planet could survive passing through a black hole and emerge unharmed on the other side.

Q: What rating did the reviewer give A Wilderness of Stars?

The reviewer gave the book a 3 out of 5 stars, finding it entertaining but not extraordinary, and had reservations about certain elements.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The book follows Vega, the last astronomer, as she embarks on a perilous journey to find a cure for her dying world, guided by the appearance of two stars and the enigmatic Architects.

• The author's prose is praised for its elegance and atmospheric descriptions, while the book's mystery keeps readers engaged with breadcrumb-like hints throughout the story.

• The reviewer disliked the inclusion of the antagonist Hoyt, finding his motivations unclear, and expressed concerns about the slow pacing and the scientific believability of elements such as a visible black hole.