WATCH LIVE: Parkland School Shooter Penalty Phase Trial - Motion Hearing

TL;DR

The defense argues that the state's use of Violent 3 test questions during deposition crossed ethical and copyright boundaries.

Transcript

okay i guess there's a difference between you all of your microphone on or off and then he has to adjust everything accordingly just so you know okay i'm sorry i won't push any more buttons the court order that i'm referring to was signed by your honor on uh january 24th 2022 and it was the court order was in response to the fact that some of our e... Read More

Key Insights

• ❓ The defense asserts that the state's use of Violent 3 test questions in a witness deposition violates ethical guidelines and copyright laws.
• 🏆 The defense argues that administering the Violent 3 test requires specific qualifications, which the state does not possess.
• 🛄 The defense claims that the state's use of the test questions improperly aims to obtain contradictory answers from the witness.

Questions & Answers

Q: What is the defense's objection regarding the state's use of Violent 3 test questions during deposition?

The defense argues that the state's use of Violent 3 test questions by a non-licensed psychologist is improper and infringes upon copyright laws.

Q: What is the defense's concern about the state asking Violent 3 test questions during the perpetuation of the witness's testimony?

The defense believes that the state intends to obtain contradictory answers from the witness, which would challenge the credibility of their own expert's findings.

Q: What qualifications are required to administer the Violent 3 test?

The Violent 3 test requires specific qualifications and should be administered by a licensed psychologist or a clinically working with a psychologist.

Q: What is the defense's argument regarding the court's order on expert data sharing and confidentiality?

The defense contends that the state violated the court's order by using the expert data for cross-examination purposes instead of allowing the state's experts to form their own conclusions.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The defense claims that the state used Violent 3 test questions in a deposition of a witness, contrary to the established guidelines and qualifications for administering the test.

• They argue that the state's use of the test questions by a non-licensed psychologist is improper and violates copyright laws.

• The defense believes that the state's intention is to obtain contradictory answers from the witness in order to challenge the credibility of their own expert's findings.

• They request the court to prevent the state from using these questions in the perpetuation of the witness's testimony.