Maxwell Brack Sentencing 09/27/16

TL;DR

Maxwell Brack is sentenced to a minimum of 70 years and a maximum of 100 years for second-degree murder.

Transcript

ready this is case number 161 1705 people versus Maxwell L Max BR he's here for sentencing y on behalf the people Ronald whitesman on behalf of Mr brck good morning judge all right good morning The Advisory guidelines of 4 225 to 562 are those accurate as far as the defense is concerned they are not Jon all right uh let's take them one by one sure ... Read More

Key Insights

• ❓ The defense challenges the accuracy of the advisory guidelines for Brack's sentencing.
• 🖤 The prosecution highlights Brack's lack of remorse and attempts to obstruct justice.
• 😑 The victim's family members express their pain and desire for justice.
• 🫵 The judge views Brack's behavior during the trial as disrespectful and lacking empathy.

Questions & Answers

Q: What were the defense's main challenges regarding advisory guidelines for Brack's sentencing?

The defense argued against the accuracy of prior convictions and juvenile adjudications scores, claiming that Brack only had one prior low severity felony conviction and one prior juvenile conviction for joyriding.

Q: How did the prosecution attempt to score higher on offense variables?

The prosecution argued that the circumstances of the crime, where Brack put the victim's body in a dumpster and left it on the curb, should score higher on offense variables. They also claimed that Brack obstructed justice by hiding the body and lying to the police.

Q: What emotions were expressed by the victim's family members during the hearing?

The family members expressed anger, pain, and a desire for Brack to suffer. They shared their grief over the loss of their loved one and the impact it has had on their lives.

Q: What was the defendant's response to the accusations against him?

Brack maintained his innocence and expressed his dissatisfaction with the trial proceedings. He claimed that he was not smiling at being found guilty but instead was reacting to an incident with a deputy outside the courtroom.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Defense challenges the accuracy of certain advisory guidelines for Brack's sentencing.

• Defense argues against the scoring of prior convictions and juvenile adjudications for Brack's criminal record.

• Prosecution highlights Brack's lack of remorse and attempts to obstruct justice, requesting a higher score on offense variables.

• Family members express their pain and desire for Brack to suffer, while the defendant maintains his innocence.