REAL LAWYER REACTS: Chad Daybell Hearing on Motion to Sever Case From Lori Vallow

TL;DR

Chad Dabell's lawyer argues for the cases to be severed, highlighting the need for different defenses. No confessions from either side have been reported.

Transcript

what's up everybody we're back at it here it's Monday probably night time when you're watching this but I got a ton of messages over the weekend about this motion to sever the hearing was had at the end of last week for Chad dabell who of course wants to sever his case from his wife Lori uh vallo day Bell for these murder charges coming in we've ta... Read More

Key Insights

• 🧚 Chad Dabell's defense argues for separate trials to ensure a fair judgment based on his actions alone, rather than being tied to Lori Vallow's case.
• 🪜 The absence of any confessions from either side adds another layer of complexity to the trial.
• 🇨🇷 The prosecution emphasizes the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of a joint trial, citing the similarity of witnesses and evidence.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why does Chad Dabell want the cases to be severed?

Chad Dabell's defense team argues for separate trials as their defense strategy will be "diametrically different" from Lori Vallow's defense. They want to avoid guilt by association.

Q: Are there any confessions in this murder case?

No recorded confessions have been reported by either side. Both the prosecution and Chad Dabell's attorney confirmed this during the hearing.

Q: What does the prosecution argue against the severance of the cases?

The prosecution believes that having a joint trial is more efficient and cost-effective as the witnesses and evidence will be similar if not identical in both cases.

Q: What is the suggested compromise for the trial?

A possible compromise is to have two juries in the trial, with one focused on Chad Dabell and the other on Lori Vallow. This would allow the defense strategies to be more distinct while still considering the shared evidence.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Chad Dabell's attorney argues for the cases to be severed, claiming that his defense will be "diametrically different" from Lori Vallow's defense.

• The prosecution objects, stating that the witnesses and evidence will be similar if not identical in both cases.

• A possible compromise suggested is to have two juries in the trial, with one focused on Chad Dabell and the other on Lori Vallow.