LIVE! Real Lawyer Reacts Affidavits & Motion To Quash -Does Bethany Funke Have Exculpatory Evidence?

TL;DR

Defense attorney files motion to quash subpoena issued to Bethany Funk, a potential material witness in Brian Laundrie's case.

Transcript

it goes quiet for a while and then it comes back and we've got some really interesting things that we have found out now that we actually have the motion to quash the affidavits why are they subpoenaing Bethany Funk what do they want to know which side subpoenaing her what are their reasons for trying to quash The subpoena and we discussed a lot of... Read More

Key Insights

• 🖤 The defense questions the lack of a hearing in the issuance of the subpoena to Bethany Funk.
• 🦻 The defense argues that presenting exculpatory evidence at a preliminary hearing is unnecessary.
• 💁 Bethany Funk's testimony may contain information that is material to the case and potentially exculpatory to Brian Laundrie.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why did the defense file a motion to quash the subpoena?

The defense believes that the subpoena was improperly issued without a hearing and fails to establish Bethany Funk as a material witness.

Q: What does the defense argue about presenting exculpatory evidence at a preliminary hearing?

The defense claims that presenting exculpatory evidence at a preliminary hearing is unnecessary, as the purpose of the hearing is to determine probable cause, not innocence or guilt.

Q: What is the significance of Bethany Funk's potential testimony?

Bethany Funk's testimony may have information that is exculpatory to Brian Laundrie, potentially proving his innocence or providing evidence that someone else committed the crime.

Q: Can the subpoena be quashed?

The court may order a hearing to determine the validity of the subpoena, but it is uncertain whether the subpoena will be quashed or not.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Defense attorney files a motion to quash a subpoena issued to Bethany Funk in the Brian Laundrie case.

• The motion argues that the subpoena was improperly issued without a hearing and fails to establish Bethany Funk as a material witness.

• The defense claims that presenting exculpatory evidence at a preliminary hearing is unnecessary.