Derek Medina "Facebook Murder" Trial Day 6 Part 5 11/18/15

TL;DR

Defense and prosecution debate the admissibility of motions in a court case, including hearsay evidence and expert testimony.

Transcript

for for for required to put on a case Okay so with that being said uh defense on your to-do list well this morning uh around 8:15 or 8:20 emails were sent with regards to three motions eliminated the prosecution filed um I didn't see the emails until a little after 9:00 um and to be quite candid with you judge I was only able to glean over them sin... Read More

Key Insights

• 💍 The defense and prosecution are engaged in a debate over the timeliness and admissibility of various motions in the court case.
• ⚾ The defense argues that certain motions should be struck as untimely based on the court's deadline, while the prosecution disagrees.
• 💼 The prosecution questions the relevance of hearsay evidence and expert testimony in the case.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why does the defense argue that certain motions should be struck as untimely?

The defense believes that the motions were filed after the court's deadline and therefore should not be considered in the case.

Q: What is the prosecution's argument against the admissibility of hearsay evidence?

The prosecution argues that the statements made by the deceased victim to the witness are hearsay and not subject to any exception under the law.

Q: How does the defense respond to the prosecution's argument on hearsay evidence?

The defense argues that the statements fall under the exception of the declarant's state of mind and are relevant to their self-defense and battered spouse defense.

Q: Why does the prosecution question the relevance of expert testimony?

The prosecution argues that the expert's opinions are not based on studies specifically related to the drug in question and therefore should not be considered relevant.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Defense and prosecution debate the timeliness of motions filed in the court case.

• Defense argues that certain motions should be struck as untimely based on the court's deadline.

• Prosecution argues against the admissibility of hearsay evidence and questions the relevance of expert testimony.