Kellen Winslow Trial Read back of Jane Does Testimony Part 2 | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

Cross-examination reveals inconsistencies in Jane Doe's testimony and raises doubts about her credibility.

Key Insights

• 🤨 Jane Doe's testimony has inconsistencies that raise doubts about her credibility.
• ❓ Officer Emig gave a different version of events from Jane Doe's statements to the investigator for the District Attorney's Office.
• 🙊 Jane Doe's decision to not be specific in her details until speaking to Mr. Dan Owens calls into question the accuracy of her statements.

Transcript

Read and summarize the transcript of this video on Glasp Reader (beta).

Questions & Answers

Q: Did Jane Doe give a different version of events to Officer Emig than she did to the investigator for the District Attorney's Office?

Yes, Officer Emig stated that Jane Doe's statements to him differed from her statements to the investigator.

Q: Did Jane Doe mention being picked up in a dark-colored SUV by Kellen Winslow?

No, Jane Doe did not say that she was picked up by Kellen Winslow in a dark-colored SUV.

Q: Did Jane Doe recall being provided alcohol by Kellen Winslow and blacking out?

No, Jane Doe denied being provided alcohol by Kellen Winslow and blacking out.

Q: Did Jane Doe mention being videotaped during the assault?

Yes, Jane Doe stated in her phone call with Officer Emig that she was being videotaped.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Jane Doe Number Four testified at the preliminary hearing in the Kellen Winslow case, but her cross-examination reveals inconsistencies in her statements.

• Officer Emig stated that Jane Doe gave a different version of events to him than she did to the investigator for the District Attorney's Office.

• Jane Doe called a hotline for potential victims of sex allegations and was directed to Officer Emig, who took her report of a sexual offense.

• Officer Emig advised Jane Doe not to be specific in her details until she spoke to Mr. Dan Owens, raising questions about the accuracy of her statements.