Studying for Exams Suck | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

The author discusses the challenges of final exams in law school and questions the value of general education requirements in college.

Key Insights

• 🧑‍🎓 Final exams in law school are heavily weighted, often comprising 100% of a student's grade.
• 👮 The author prioritizes family and entrepreneurial pursuits over solely relying on a law degree for success.
• 🎓 General education requirements in college are costly and may not provide significant value to a student's education.
• 👻 The author suggests that cutting general education requirements in half could reduce costs and allow students to focus more on their major.
• 🎓 Learning and education are important, but excessive focus on general education requirements may not be the most efficient use of time and resources.
• 🎓 Specializing in one area may lead to greater expertise and success, both in college education and in investing.
• 🎓 College education can still hold value if approached in the right way, especially for professions like medicine, accounting, and engineering.

Transcript

Read and summarize the transcript of this video on Glasp Reader (beta).

Questions & Answers

Q: How are final exams weighted in law school, and how does the author feel about them?

Final exams in law school are worth 100% of a student's grade, and the author acknowledges that they are challenging. However, the author prioritizes family and entrepreneurial pursuits over solely relying on a law degree for success.

Q: Does the author believe there is value in college education?

Yes, the author believes there is value in college education if it is approached in the right way. The author emphasizes the importance of education and learning, but questions the excessive focus on general education requirements.

Q: What is the author's stance on general education requirements?

The author argues that general education requirements in college are expensive and often not relevant to a student's desired career path. The author suggests cutting these requirements in half to reduce costs and allow students to focus more on their major.

Q: How does the author view the concept of diversification, both in college education and in investing?

The author questions the value of diversification in college education, arguing that specializing in one area can be more beneficial. The author compares this to the concept of diversifying stock portfolios in investing, suggesting that true expertise and success may come from focusing on a specific area.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The author is preparing for final exams in law school while also juggling other responsibilities, such as volunteering at a legal clinic and preparing for the launch of a publication.

• The author questions the conventional approach to education and emphasizes the importance of pursuing a degree for personal growth and entrepreneurial opportunities.

• The author argues that general education requirements in college are costly and don't necessarily add value to a student's education, suggesting that they should be cut in half.