Matthew Apperson Disorderly Conduct Trial (Partial) Day 1 Part 2 10/21/15 | Summary and Q&A

662 views
โ€ข
October 21, 2015
by
Law&Crime Network
YouTube video player
Matthew Apperson Disorderly Conduct Trial (Partial) Day 1 Part 2 10/21/15

TL;DR

Homeowner's surveillance camera coverage was limited, allowing perpetrators to approach the front door without being captured on video.

Install to Summarize YouTube Videos and Get Transcripts

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ™ˆ The homeowner's surveillance camera coverage is limited due to blind spots near the front door.
  • ๐Ÿ“ฃ The camera only captures the front area outside, excluding the gap between the bush and the area blocked by another wall.
  • ๐Ÿฅณ The homeowner applied for an injunction on the same day as the alleged incident, demonstrating their proactive approach to address security concerns.
  • โ“ The homeowner did not witness the incident and only found out about it the following Monday.
  • ๐Ÿคจ The camera's obstructed view raises concerns about the effectiveness of surveillance in providing evidence in case of incidents.
  • ๐Ÿ˜“ The information presented casts doubts on the reliability of the surveillance footage as evidence for the claimed incident.
  • ๐Ÿ›€ The homeowner's immediate action in applying for an injunction shows their commitment to addressing security issues and protecting their property.

Questions & Answers

Q: Is there a surveillance camera in the window shown in the picture of the front of the residence?

Yes, there is a camera in the window, specifically the front bedroom window.

Q: Does the camera face the front area near the front door?

Yes, it faces towards the front area outside, including the walkway and the hollowed-out space in the concrete, but not the gap between the bush.

Q: Can someone approach the front door without being seen by the camera?

Yes, if someone steps onto the front step of the defendant's residence, they can walk towards the front door without being in the camera's line of sight.

Q: Did the homeowner take any legal actions regarding the alleged incident?

Yes, the homeowner applied for an injunction against Matterson on the same day as the incident was alleged.

Summary & Key Takeaways

  • The homeowner has a surveillance camera placed in the front bedroom window, facing the front area outside and the walkway.

  • However, the camera's view is obstructed by another wall, leaving a blind spot near the front door.

  • The homeowner applied for an injunction on the same day as the alleged incident but did not witness it, and only found out about it the following Monday.

Share This Summary ๐Ÿ“š

Summarize YouTube Videos and Get Video Transcripts with 1-Click

Download browser extensions on:

Explore More Summaries from Law&Crime Network ๐Ÿ“š

Summarize YouTube Videos and Get Video Transcripts with 1-Click

Download browser extensions on: