e.l.f. Mattifying Cream Foundation vs. Lorac Cococin Cream Compact: Splurge or Save?

TL;DR

Comparing e.l.f. and Lorac cream foundations in terms of coverage and texture.

Transcript

hello everyone welcome back to my channel today i'm going to be comparing a couple of foundations for you guys i did something similar to this a few months back and you guys seem to really respond well to it so i'll be sure to link that video down below if you haven't seen it yet if you guys have any other products or brands or anything like that t... Read More

Key Insights

• The e.l.f. Mattifying Cream Foundation provides full coverage and is suitable for dry or combination skin types due to its creamy texture.
• Lorac Cococin Cream Compact offers medium coverage and is more suitable for oily skin as it is more mattifying.
• The reviewer found the e.l.f. foundation to be more buildable without appearing cakey, unlike the Lorac foundation.
• Color matching was an issue for both foundations, with the e.l.f. running darker and the Lorac being more pink-toned than expected.
• Both foundations are marketed as mattifying but the Lorac foundation controls oil better, making it ideal for oily skin.
• The application method involved using a q-tip and an e.l.f. powder brush, with NYX Dewy Finish Setting Spray to combat dryness.
• The reviewer appreciates the wide color range offered by Lorac, although the online color representation was misleading.
• Despite not being perfect dupes, both foundations are considered good products for different skin types and preferences.

Questions & Answers

Q: What are the main differences in coverage between the two foundations?

The e.l.f. Mattifying Cream Foundation offers fuller coverage, making it ideal for those who prefer to cover blemishes quickly without additional steps like concealers. In contrast, the Lorac Cococin Cream Compact provides medium coverage, which might require additional concealer for a more flawless look.

Q: How do the foundations perform in terms of application and texture?

The e.l.f. foundation has a creamy texture that blends smoothly onto the skin, while the Lorac foundation tends to feel drier and more powder-like upon blending. The e.l.f. foundation is noted for its ability to build coverage without looking cakey, whereas Lorac can appear cakey with multiple layers.

Q: What skin types are best suited for each foundation?

The e.l.f. foundation is better suited for dry or combination skin types due to its creamy texture that does not emphasize dryness. On the other hand, the Lorac foundation is more suitable for oily skin as it provides a more mattifying finish and controls oil better throughout the day.

Q: Were there any issues with color matching for these foundations?

Yes, there were color matching issues. The e.l.f. foundation was found to run darker than expected, while the Lorac foundation appeared more pink-toned, which was not ideal for the reviewer's yellow undertones. These discrepancies were partly due to ordering online without seeing the shades in person.

Q: How does the reviewer feel about the color range offered by the brands?

The reviewer appreciates Lorac's wide color range, which is not always common in high-end or drugstore brands. However, the online color representation was misleading, leading to a less-than-ideal color match. Despite this, Lorac's effort to offer diverse shades is commended.

Q: What is the reviewer's overall opinion of the two foundations?

The reviewer believes both foundations are great products but for different skin types and preferences. The e.l.f. foundation is preferred for its full coverage and creamy application, while the Lorac foundation is praised for its mattifying properties suitable for oily skin.

Q: What application method was used for the foundations?

The application method involved using a q-tip to apply the foundation onto the skin, followed by blending with an e.l.f. powder brush. To address the dryness of both foundations, the reviewer used NYX Dewy Finish Setting Spray to slightly dampen the brush before application.

Q: Are these foundations considered dupes for each other?

The reviewer concludes that these foundations are not exact dupes despite their similar packaging and marketing as mattifying products. They cater to different skin types and preferences, with e.l.f. being more suitable for full coverage and dry skin, and Lorac for medium coverage and oily skin.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The video compares e.l.f. Mattifying Cream Foundation and Lorac Cococin Cream Compact, focusing on their coverage, texture, and suitability for different skin types. The e.l.f. foundation is more suitable for dry or combination skin, while Lorac is better for oily skin.

• Application involved using a q-tip and e.l.f. powder brush, with NYX Dewy Finish Setting Spray to address dryness. The e.l.f. foundation provides fuller coverage, whereas Lorac offers a more natural, medium coverage.

• Color matching issues were noted, with e.l.f. running darker and Lorac more pink-toned. Despite not being perfect dupes, both foundations are praised for their quality and suitability for different skin preferences.