New Mexico AG REFUSES To Defend Democrat Gun Ban, Governor Will LOSE Every Lawsuit

TL;DR

The New Mexico Attorney General refuses to defend the governor in lawsuits over a ban on carrying guns, potentially leading to a default judgment against her.

Transcript

cast IRL will be live in Miami with Patrick Bet David Donald Trump Jr Matt Gates and Luke gradkowski join us there get your tickets by clicking the link in the description below or by going to timcast.com oh boy this is a good one New Mexico attorney general says he won't defend governor in lawsuits over ban on carrying guns my duty to uphold and d... Read More

Key Insights

• 🤕 The New Mexico Attorney General's decision not to defend the governor in lawsuits over the gun ban showcases a divide within the state's legal system.
• 😀 The governor's office may struggle to respond effectively to the lawsuits and could face a default judgment as a result.
• 🔫 The lack of data supporting the ban on carrying guns raises doubts about its effectiveness and suggests a manufactured crisis to push for stricter gun control measures.
• 🫱 The emergence of alternative platforms like Rumble and the success of conservative brands indicate a shift in the culture war, with independent media gaining traction and challenging the mainstream narrative.
• 🧑‍🚒 Morale in the fight for freedom and America's values is crucial, and the belief in the worthiness of the fight is paramount.
• 🤨 The potential legal responsibility of the governor if citizens are disarmed and become victims of crime raises important questions about the consequences of such policies.
• 🪹 The pattern of releasing criminals and emptying prisons aligns with the Communist strategy to create chaos and take advantage of the resulting destabilization.

Questions & Answers

Q: Why is the New Mexico Attorney General refusing to defend the governor in lawsuits over the gun ban?

The Attorney General believes that upholding and defending the constitutional rights of citizens is his duty, and he does not support the governor's ban on carrying guns. Therefore, he will not provide legal representation to the governor in these lawsuits.

Q: What implications does this have for the governor's office?

Without the support of the Attorney General, the governor's office will need to handle the lawsuits on their own. This could result in a default judgment against the governor and potential negative consequences for both her and the taxpayers.

Q: Is this part of a larger trend among attorneys general?

While it is not common for attorneys general to refuse to defend their governors, there has been a call for a widespread approach among attorneys general to not prosecute free speech cases. This New Mexico case could be seen as a trial balloon to gauge the response to banning guns and pave the way for future gun control measures.

Q: What is the importance of data in supporting policies like banning guns?

The lack of data supporting the ban on carrying guns is a significant issue. There is evidence that areas with higher gun ownership have lower gun crime rates. Additionally, countries like Australia, often cited as an example of successful gun control, saw an increase in gun purchases after implementing stricter laws. This raises questions about the effectiveness of such policies.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The New Mexico Attorney General, the state's top lawyer, refuses to defend the governor in lawsuits regarding a ban on carrying guns.

• This decision leaves the governor vulnerable and without legal representation.

• The ban on carrying guns in New Mexico has already sparked lawsuits, and without the Attorney General's support, the governor's office may struggle to respond effectively.