Norton Security 2017 Review

TL;DR

Norton Security's subscription-based service performs well in blocking web-based threats but lacks stability and speed in its user interface.

Transcript

northern security and 2017 let's check it out you guys have been asking for the lot so here you have it first things first I'm just gonna run their life update I generally don't talk about things like pricing in my refused but I did notice that they have turned this product into a subscription-based service now and I think the default prices on the... Read More

Key Insights

• 👤 Norton Security has transitioned to a subscription-based model with varying prices, potentially making it more accessible to different users.
• 🤵 Norton's performance in blocking web-based malware links was generally effective, but some unusual behavior was observed, indicating room for improvement.
• 👤 The user interface of Norton Security was slow and clunky, with delayed alerts and latency issues, which negatively impacted the user experience.
• 🤨 Norton Security exhibited good removal capabilities, but difficulties were encountered in removing one inactive file, which raises concerns about its technical ability.
• ⚾ Norton's focus on execution-based protection indicates a shift in its approach to security.
• ❓ Second opinion scanners did not find any malware, suggesting that Norton's protection is reliable.
• 🤨 The lack of stability in Norton Security's user interface raises concerns about its performance during a real-time malware attack.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Norton Security has transitioned to a subscription-based service, with varying prices.

• In a test, Norton successfully blocked most web-based malware links, however, some unusual behaviors were observed.

• The user interface of Norton Security is slow and clunky, with delayed alerts and latency in responses.