Europe’s Colonial Past and the Nostalgia for Empire in Brexit

Europe’s Colonial Past and the Nostalgia for Empire in Brexit

Introduction:

The idea of 'making Britain great again' and the nostalgia for empire in Brexit are two sides of the same coin. The Brexit vote should not be seen in isolation but understood in the context of Britain's colonial history and ongoing colonial configuration. The romanticization of the British Empire and the desire to regain control and superiority are driving forces behind the Leave campaign. This article will explore the connection between Europe's colonial past, Brexit, and the longing for empire.

The Colonial Legacy:

Britain's colonial past has left a lasting impact on its national identity and psyche. Despite the amnesia about the details of Britain's imperial history, there is a tendency to romanticize the days of the British Empire. The nostalgia for empire is deeply rooted in the belief of racial and cultural superiority. The Leave vote can be seen as a manifestation of this desire to reclaim Britain's former glory and dominance.

White Entitlement and Backlash:

The vote to exit the EU was largely carried by the propertied, pensioned, well-off, white middle class based in southern England. It signified a shoring up of white entitlement to territory, resources, and identification as British. The rhetoric of 'taking back control' used by the Leave campaign is indicative of an imagined victimhood on the part of white nationalists. It is a backlash against the progress made in civil rights and non-discrimination by minority groups in white hegemonic societies.

Deflection and Precarious Position:

The romanticization of the British Empire has helped deflect attention from the precarious position of poor white Britons in the economic structure. They were encouraged to believe in their economic, political, and racial superiority to the rest of the subjects of the empire. This deflection allowed them to overlook their own struggles and focus on a glorified version of the past.

Imperial Mythology and Fantasy:

Brexit has become a vehicle for Britain's appetite for imperial mythology and fantasy. Former Foreign Secretary and current Prime Minister Boris Johnson claimed that Brexit does not mean Britain turning in on itself. Instead, it is an opportunity for Britain to rediscover its role as a great, global, trading nation. This rhetoric is a dressed-up version of Britain's colonial history, portraying it as a small island nation's attempt to do good in the world.

The Mediterranean Stand-off:

The stand-off over disembarkations of survivors rescued by civilian search and rescue operators in the Mediterranean highlights the clash between international law and the Italian government's stance. The Italian government issued a decree banning certain rescue vessels from Italian waters except for the selective disembarkation of individuals facing medical emergencies or considered vulnerable. This stand-off has involved multiple rescue vessels and has been a point of contention between Italy, France, NGOs, and international law.

Conclusion:

The connection between Europe's colonial past, Brexit, and the nostalgia for empire is undeniable. The Brexit vote is a reflection of the desire to reclaim Britain's former dominance and control. It is fueled by a romanticized version of the British Empire and a sense of white entitlement. In order to address these underlying issues, it is crucial to acknowledge and confront the colonial legacy. Here are three actionable pieces of advice:

1. Educate and raise awareness about Britain's colonial history and its impact on contemporary society. This will help dispel romanticized notions of the empire and foster a more nuanced understanding of the past.

2. Promote inclusivity and equality in society to counteract the backlash against progress made in civil rights and non-discrimination. This includes empowering marginalized communities and challenging narratives of white superiority.

3. Advocate for humane and compassionate immigration policies that prioritize the safety and well-being of individuals in need. This involves working towards a collective approach that respects international law and upholds the principles of human rights.

By addressing these issues, we can strive towards a more inclusive and equitable future, free from the nostalgia for empire and the divisive rhetoric that accompanies it.