Exploring the Intersection of Humanitarian Discourse and Border Security in the EU

Exploring the Intersection of Humanitarian Discourse and Border Security in the EU

Introduction:
The Mediterranean borders of the European Union (EU) have become the focal point of discussions surrounding humanitarian discourse and border security. Empirical research has shed light on the emergence of a humanitarian discourse that advocates for migrants' rights and emphasizes the importance of freedom from inhuman treatment. This discourse gained prominence when the Italian government refused to provide a port of safety to the SeaWatch3 vessel in January 2019. In this article, we will examine the intertwined concepts of security and borders, the politicization of migration, and the role of Italy in securing the EU's Mediterranean borders.

The Interplay of Security and Borders:
Throughout the literature on International Relations (IR) and EU politics, security debates have been a common theme. Over time, the concepts of security and borders have become closely intertwined. The influx of migrants crossing the Mediterranean in the mid-2010s led to heightened security threats, which in turn influenced political discourse surrounding border closures. Many center-right political leaders portrayed irregular migrants as criminals who should not be accepted within EU territory, leading to the adoption of exclusionary policies.

Italy's Role in Securing the Mediterranean Borders:
Situated in the heart of the Mediterranean, Italy plays a crucial role in ensuring the security of the EU's Mediterranean borders. In 2018-2019, the Italian government implemented a "closed ports" approach, refusing to allow Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) conducting Search and Rescue (SAR) operations to disembark rescued migrants. This approach sparked a new wave of discourses and security priorities, as humanitarian concerns clashed with the government's stance on border security.

The Politicization of Migration:
Migration has become a highly politicized issue in Western European countries, dominating the political debate. The politicization of migration has brought the issue into the public arena, where it intersects with both security and humanitarian dimensions. The securitization of migration, which refers to the capacity to control borders, manage threats, and identify orders, has been a focal point of research on EU border security. However, the emergence of humanitarian discourses has added a new layer to the discussion.

Exploring the PREMIUM Project:
The PREMIUM Project, spearheaded by Sparke & Keane in collaboration with EDLAB, offers valuable insights into the marketability and client propositions of a potential Corporate Social Responsibility and Development (CSRD) expertise center. By utilizing knowledge on the CSRD and the linked Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework, the project helps clients understand their impact on the environment, society, and governance. This project highlights the importance of incorporating social and environmental considerations in decision-making processes.

Actionable Advice:

1. Foster Dialogue and Collaboration: In addressing the complex challenges at the Mediterranean borders, it is crucial to foster dialogue and collaboration among stakeholders. By engaging in open conversations, policymakers, NGOs, and the public can work towards finding comprehensive solutions that prioritize both security concerns and humanitarian considerations.

2. Enhance Border Management Practices: Effective border management practices are essential for maintaining security while upholding humanitarian principles. Investing in resources, training, and technology can help improve border control, enhance search and rescue operations, and ensure the protection of migrants' rights.

3. Promote Comprehensive Immigration Policies: Instead of relying solely on exclusionary policies, it is essential to adopt comprehensive immigration policies that address the root causes of migration, provide legal pathways, and promote integration. By focusing on long-term solutions, the EU can create a more sustainable approach to migration management.

Conclusion:
The intersection of humanitarian discourse and border security at the Mediterranean borders of the EU presents a complex and multifaceted challenge. While security concerns have traditionally dominated discussions, the emergence of humanitarian discourses has added a new dimension to the debate. By finding common ground and incorporating actionable advice, policymakers and stakeholders can work towards a comprehensive approach that ensures both security and respect for migrants' rights. Through collaboration, improved border management practices, and the promotion of comprehensive immigration policies, the EU can navigate this challenging landscape and strive to achieve a balance between security and humanitarian considerations.