The Colonial Remains of Brexit: Empire Nostalgia and Narcissistic Nationalism in Politics and NGOs

The Colonial Remains of Brexit: Empire Nostalgia and Narcissistic Nationalism in Politics and NGOs

Introduction:
The Brexit referendum, which resulted in Britain's departure from the EU, was a significant event that triggered a sense of cataclysmic change and sociopolitical emergency. This article explores the underlying factors behind Brexit, specifically the persisting imperial attitudes and narcissistic yearnings that influenced the decision. It also delves into the role of politics and NGOs in Western Europe and their relationship with the state and the market.

Imperial Nostalgia and Brexit:
Boris Johnson and other prominent figures in the Brexit campaign tapped into colonial nostalgia, evoking images of a glorious imperial past. This longing for the days of empire resonated with sections of British society, particularly those who witnessed the decline of the empire after World War II. The connection between Brexit, empire, and World War II proved highly effective in garnering support for leaving the EU. It created a sense of national attachment and preserved the idea of British exceptionalism.

Brexit and Postcolonial Studies:
The departure from the EU marked the end of another form of colonialism, as Britain sought to redefine its position on the global stage. However, Theresa May's vision of a "truly global Britain" is selective and skewed, representing a skewed representation of Britain's role in colonial history. Postcolonial studies offer valuable insights into understanding the implications of Brexit and the underlying motivations rooted in colonial attitudes.

Politics and NGOs in Western Europe:
In the realm of politics, the influence of market actors has become increasingly significant. The push for corporate social responsibility highlights the call for businesses to take responsibility for social and environmental issues. This shift has implications for democratic representation, as market actors gain power and influence.

The Role of the State and the Market:
NGOs in Western Europe navigate their political actions by determining whether to target the state or the market. The openness or closedness of the market is the determining factor in this decision, as resources and politicization play a minor role. Even when state opportunity structures are closed, NGOs still target the state, emphasizing the significance of political engagement.

NGOs and the Market as Political Action:
The market acts as an alternative option for NGOs to take political action, rather than being seen as a second-best option. NGOs have significant leeway in choosing when to turn to the market, highlighting the flexibility and adaptability of these organizations. This finding challenges the notion that the state is the sole arena for political engagement.

Actionable Advice:

1. Reflect on Historical Context: When analyzing political events and movements, it is crucial to consider the historical context that shapes them. Understanding the lingering effects of empire and colonial attitudes can provide valuable insights into current sociopolitical dynamics.

2. Embrace Postcolonial Perspectives: Incorporating postcolonial studies into the analysis of Brexit and other political phenomena can shed light on the underlying motivations and power dynamics at play. It offers a nuanced understanding of the complexities of imperial nostalgia and its influence on decision-making.

3. Recognize the Role of Non-State Actors: NGOs and market actors play an increasingly significant role in shaping politics and driving social change. Acknowledging their agency and considering their strategies and motivations can provide a more comprehensive understanding of political landscapes.

Conclusion:
The Brexit referendum and the role of NGOs in Western Europe highlight the enduring influence of imperialism and colonial attitudes. The nostalgia for empire and the desire for national exceptionalism can shape political decisions and campaigns. Additionally, the changing dynamics between the state and the market in politics underscore the need to consider non-state actors when analyzing political processes. By understanding these factors, we can navigate the complexities of sociopolitical landscapes more effectively.