Norton Security 2016 Review | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

Norton Security in 2016 has a clean user interface and good web blocking signatures, but the update process needs improvement.

Key Insights

• 👤 The user interface of Norton Security in 2016 is clean and organized, but considered a downgrade from the previous version.
• 😒 The update process of Norton Security in 2016 could use improvement, as it sometimes shows updates as complete when they are not.
• 👋 Norton has good web blocking signatures and effectively blocks unsafe URLs.
• 🙂 The resource usage of Norton Security in 2016 is slightly higher compared to previous versions.
• 🥳 Norton successfully detects and removes 88.4% of known malware samples, which is an average detection ratio.
• 🕵️ Norton performs well in preventing the execution of unknown files and effectively removes detected threats.
• 🕵️ Second opinion scanners like Malwarebytes, Hitman Pro, and Zamana do not detect any threats on a system protected by Norton Security in 2016.

Transcript

my previous review of Norton security sparked a lot of debate some of it was great some of it was just amateur trawling and spamming it's a new year now and it's time to start fresh so here's my review of Norton security in 2016 the first thing I'm going to say about their user interface is that it's clean its organized but it's a downgrade from th... Read More

Questions & Answers

Q: How is the user interface of Norton Security in 2016 different from the previous version?

The user interface of Norton Security in 2016 is clean and organized, but is considered a downgrade from the previous version. The previous version had a black-themed interface with a live map of threats, which was well-liked.

Q: How does Norton handle updates in the 2016 version?

The update process of Norton Security in 2016 could use some improvement. It sometimes shows updates as complete when they are not, leading to confusion. Manual updates may be required multiple times before all updates are actually installed.

Q: How well does Norton Security in 2016 block unsafe URLs?

Norton has good web blocking signatures and effectively blocks unsafe URLs. The review provided shows that Norton successfully blocks various unsafe URLs and keeps the system safe.

Q: How does Norton Security in 2016 perform in detecting and removing known malware samples?

Norton Security in 2016 detects and removes 88.4% of known malware samples, which is considered an average detection ratio. While it is not excellent, it is still a decent level of protection.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The user interface of Norton Security in 2016 is clean and organized, although a downgrade from the previous version. It is still functional and useful.

• The update process could be improved, as it sometimes shows updates as complete when they are not.

• Norton has good web blocking signatures and effectively blocks unsafe URLs.

• The resource usage of Norton Security in 2016 is slightly higher compared to previous versions.

• Norton successfully detects and removes 88.4% of known malware samples, which is an average detection ratio.

• Norton performs well in preventing the execution of unknown files and effectively removes detected threats.

• Second opinion scanners like Malwarebytes, Hitman Pro, and Zamana do not detect any threats on a system protected by Norton Security in 2016.