Three print methods, each with different economics, quality profiles, and ideal use cases. Here's how to choose the right one without overpaying or underdelivering.

When a US brand commissions custom packaging, the print method question is often answered by the supplier "we do digital" or "we do flexo" rather than by a deliberate decision from the brand based on what best fits their volume, timeline, and quality requirements. The result is packaging that may be priced wrong for the volume, printed at lower quality than the brand deserves, or produced on a timeline that doesn't match the launch calendar.

Understanding print methods is not a technical exercise reserved for packaging professionals. It is a business decision with real cost and quality implications. This guide by the printing experts department of Paknify explains the three dominant methods used in US packaging production and gives clear guidance on when each is the right choice.

Digital Printing

Best for low-to-mid volume

Setup cost

None

Ideal volume

50–5,000 units

Colour accuracy

Excellent

Lead time

5–10 business days

Digital printing applies ink directly from a digital file no plates, no setup, no minimum colour registration requirements. Each unit can theoretically be different (variable data printing), making it ideal for personalised packaging, limited editions, and A/B testing designs. The absence of setup costs makes it the economical choice for lower volumes. Per-unit costs are higher than flexo at scale but the total cost at low volumes is significantly lower when setup costs are factored in.

Flexographic Printing

Best for high volume

Setup cost

$800–$2,500+

Ideal volume

5,000+ units

Colour accuracy

Good (spot colours)

Lead time

3–5 weeks

Flexographic printing uses flexible relief plates to transfer ink onto packaging substrates corrugated, kraft, film, and more. It is the dominant method for high-volume corrugated and flexible packaging production in the US. Per-unit costs at volume are significantly lower than digital, but plate setup costs mean total cost is only favourable above approximately 3,000–5,000 units per design. Colour registration is excellent for spot colours; process colour (photographic quality) is more challenging than offset or digital.

Offset Lithographic Printing

Best for premium folding cartons

Setup cost

Medium–High

Ideal volume

2,000–50,000+ units

Colour accuracy

Highest

Lead time

3–6 weeks

Offset printing transfers ink from a plate to a rubber blanket, then to the substrate producing the sharpest, most colour-accurate results of the three methods. It is the standard for premium folding cartons, rigid box wraps, and retail shelf packaging where photographic reproduction quality matters. It is not used directly on corrugated board (the surface is too textured) but is used to print the liner paper that is then laminated to corrugated. The highest quality ceiling of the three methods, with setup costs that require volume commitment to justify. "Choosing a print method is like choosing a vehicle the right answer depends entirely on where you're going, how often, and with how many passengers."

The Total Cost Calculation

The most common mistake US brands make when comparing print methods is comparing per-unit costs without factoring in setup costs. At 500 units, digital printing is almost always cheaper in total even if the per-unit price is higher, because there are no plates to pay for. At 10,000 units, flexo's lower per-unit cost combined with its amortised setup cost produces a significantly lower total. The crossover point where flexo becomes cheaper than digital in total cost is typically between 2,000 and 4,000 units depending on colour count and supplier pricing.

A simple calculation worth running: multiply per-unit cost by quantity and add setup costs for each method at your target volume. The result is total cost, not unit cost and total cost is what actually matters to a brand's margin structure.

Quality Considerations by Category

Food and beverage packaging

Colour accuracy is critical brand colours on shelf must match across production runs consistently. Offset for folding carton formats, flexo for bags and pouches. Digital for limited-edition runs or smaller volume specialty items.

E-commerce shipping boxes

Flexo on corrugated is standard for most e-commerce volumes above 3,000 units per run. Digital corrugated printing is appropriate for lower volumes and design-testing phases. The kraft liner texture means photographic reproduction is always limited design accordingly.

Premium retail packaging

Offset on folding carton, with specialty finishes applied post-print. This is the standard for cosmetics, premium food, electronics, and luxury goods. The quality ceiling is highest, the production economics require volume, and the brand impact justifies both.

Working With Your Printer

The most productive relationship with a packaging printer begins with sharing three pieces of information: volume (current and 12-month forecast), timeline (hard launch date and preferred delivery date), and design intent (number of colours, any photographic elements, finish requirements). With these inputs, a good printer recommends the method rather than defaulting to their preferred equipment and the recommendation will be in the brand's interest.

Print method is not a detail. It is a decision with real implications for cost, quality, and timeline. Making it deliberately rather than accepting a supplier default is one of the simplest ways a brand improves its packaging outcomes without changing anything else.

Offset vs. Digital vs. Flexographic Printing: A US Brand's Decision Guide