Why were these NEW cars WORSE than their predecessors? | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

In this video, the presenter discusses 10 car models that were not as good as their previous versions, highlighting specific reasons for their decline.

Key Insights

• 😨 The success of a car model does not always guarantee a better replacement.
• 😨 Design changes can significantly impact a car's appeal and reception.
• 🎴 Factors such as weight, performance, and driving experience play crucial roles in determining a car's overall quality.
• 😨 Maintaining the essence and heritage of a popular car model is essential for its successor's success.
• 🥺 Changes in engine options, drivetrain systems, and added features can lead to varying levels of customer satisfaction.

Transcript

some new cars are actually worse than their predecessors in this video i'm going to tell you about certain models which weren't as good as those that they replaced actually there's been lots of models which weren't as good as those that they replaced over the years but here i'm going to tell you the 10 worst offenders i'm at watson and you're watch... Read More

Questions & Answers

Q: Why was the Honda Civic Type R fn2 considered worse than the ep3?

The fn2 model was more expensive, heavier, had marginally more horsepower, and lacked the fun-to-drive factor due to a change in rear suspension.

Q: What distinctive features did the BMW E60 M5 possess compared to its successor?

The E60 M5 had a futuristic design, an iconic high-revving V10 engine, and the availability of an estate version, making it more appealing than the subsequent model.

Q: What were the downsides of the Ford Mustang II?

The Mustang II had an unattractive design, a weak 2.3-liter engine with only 90 horsepower, and failed to showcase the power expected from a muscle car.

Q: How did the Mazda MX-5 Mark II differ from its predecessor, the Mark I?

The Mark II lost its iconic pop-up headlights, had a less appealing design, and gained extra weight, which led to rust issues and compromised performance.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The Honda Civic Type R fn2, which succeeded the popular ep3 model, was not as good in terms of price, weight, performance, and driving experience.

• The BMW E60 M5, although an impressive high-performance saloon, lacked the character and unique design of its predecessor, the E60 M5.

• The Ford Mustang II from the 70s had a lackluster design, underpowered engine, and failed to capture the essence of a muscle car like its successful predecessor.

• The Mazda MX-5 Mark II (NB model) had design changes, including headlights and additional weight, which decreased its appeal compared to the Mark I.

• The Lotus Elan, when revived in 1989, lost its classic design and rear-wheel-drive layout, compromising its driving experience.

• The Porsche Boxster and Cayman 718 models, with their turbocharged engines, lacked the character and instant throttle response of their predecessors.

• The Toyota Celica's replacement in 1999 lacked rally heritage, had lower horsepower, and changed to a front-wheel-drive system, diminishing its performance.

• The Mitsubishi Eclipse's third-generation model, featuring a heavy V6 engine and front-wheel drive, failed to live up to its previous rally-inspired versions.

• The Volkswagen Golf GTI Mark IV disappointed with its diesel engine option, low horsepower, and unremarkable appearance compared to earlier GTI models.

• The original Tesla Model S offered free lifetime charging at superchargers, a perk that was no longer available in newer versions.