Trump & the Problem with Politics | Philosophy Tube | Summary and Q&A

November 4, 2016
Philosophy Tube
YouTube video player
Trump & the Problem with Politics | Philosophy Tube


Carl Schmidt's political philosophy explores the friend-enemy distinction, which influences both right-wing and left-wing politics, highlighting the arbitrary nature of political conflicts and the potential dangers of liberalism.

Install to Summarize YouTube Videos and Get Transcripts

Key Insights

  • 😘 The friend-enemy distinction, as emphasized by Carl Schmidt, has influenced both right-wing and left-wing politics, showcasing its broad applicability across the political spectrum.
  • 🏷️ Political conflicts often rely on arbitrary distinctions, causing harm and even death to those labeled as enemies.
  • ✊ Schmidt's ideas highlight the potential dangers of liberalism, as it fails to provide a strong sense of identity and may overlook power dynamics and the relationship between power and identity.
  • ✊ Criticisms of liberalism stem from its perceived hypocrisy and failure to address power imbalances in society.
  • ↔️ The criticism of liberalism from both the right and the left indicates that alternative perspectives exist and challenge the dominant liberal worldview.
  • ✊ Liberalism's tendency to avoid discussions about power and identity perpetuates oppression by not recognizing the impact of these factors on politics and society.


at time of filming the results of the usa presidential election are not in so whilst i wait to find out what color i should paint my doomsday bunker i invite you to the idea that this election particularly mr trump's role in it has revealed something very interesting about politics particularly if you aren't usually interested in politics at all ca... Read More

Questions & Answers

Q: What is Carl Schmidt's concept of the friend-enemy distinction?

Carl Schmidt believes that all politics ultimately relies on distinguishing between friend and enemy, where the enemy might not be personally disliked but is perceived as a threat to one's identity and is expendable in times of conflict.

Q: How does Schmidt view political conflicts and the role of evidence?

Schmidt argues that political conflicts are not based on facts but rather the fight against other identities, regardless of evidence. The distinction between friend and enemy is often arbitrary and unchangeable in the minds of those involved.

Q: What does Schmidt criticize about liberalism?

Schmidt suggests that liberalism fails to give individuals a strong sense of identity that they are willing to defend with force. Liberalism focuses on management disagreements rather than true political conflicts centered on power and identity.

Q: How does the left-wing view the friend-enemy distinction differently than the right-wing?

While the right-wing sees the friend-enemy distinction as eliminating those who do not share their identity, the left-wing defines itself in opposition to those who are rich and powerful, calling for a redistribution of power and the recognition of marginalized identities.

Summary & Key Takeaways

  • Carl Schmidt's political ideology centers around the friend-enemy distinction, where politics relies on the identification of an enemy who threatens a group's identity.

  • Political conflicts often operate based on arbitrary distinctions, such as the treatment of migrants versus refugees, showcasing the deadly consequences of such categorizations.

  • Schmidt argues that true political issues revolve around power and identity, and liberalism fails to provide a strong sense of identity that individuals are willing to fight for.

Share This Summary 📚

Summarize YouTube Videos and Get Video Transcripts with 1-Click

Download browser extensions on:

Explore More Summaries from Philosophy Tube 📚

Summarize YouTube Videos and Get Video Transcripts with 1-Click

Download browser extensions on: