Trial Attorney Says Defendant Probably Wanted To Hide That He Was Somewhere He Shouldn't Have Been | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

The prosecutor accuses Henry Segura of lying to the police while the defense raises questions about his credibility and the lack of evidence linking him to the murders.

Key Insights

• 😌 Lying to the police does not automatically make someone a murderer.
• 👮 Seeking legal advice before talking to the police is generally advised.
• ❓ The prosecution is relying on circumstantial evidence to connect Segura to the murders.
• 🤨 The defense is raising doubts about the lack of direct evidence linking Segura to the crime.
• ❓ Texts or communications between Segura and Brandi could be crucial evidence for the prosecution.
• 🙃 Both sides are focusing on establishing the credibility or lack thereof of Henry Segura.
• 🪡 The prosecution needs to provide objective evidence, such as DNA or fingerprints, to strengthen its case.

Transcript

[Applause] okay so what the prosecutor stated and I like to bring my next guest in Stanley King great civil rights trial attorney from South Jersey and you know how I love Jersey lawyers okay Stanley the prosecutor just said and there's my Jean you know if I look at this picture here's like two of my three favorite men my other ones my husband who ... Read More

Questions & Answers

Q: Would Henry Segura's lawyer advise him to tell the truth if police came to question him?

Henry Segura's lawyer would typically not advise him to talk to the police at all. If there was a need to clarify something, it would be done in the lawyer's presence to ensure the reflection of events is accurately conveyed.

Q: As a prosecutor, would you recommend someone to always call their lawyer first when questioned by the police?

Yes, as a prosecutor with substantial trial experience, it is always advised to call a lawyer before speaking to the police. Talking to the police without an attorney often leads to unfavorable outcomes for the person being questioned.

Q: How does Henry Segura's lie about his whereabouts and undisclosed phone number affect the prosecution's case?

While lying is not equivalent to being a murderer, the prosecution sees it as problematic. The undisclosed phone number places Segura at the location of the crime, potentially strengthening the prosecution's case. However, further evidence is needed to link him directly to the murders.

Q: What impact does the prosecutor's claim of potential texts or conversations between Segura and Brandi have on the strength of the case?

The prosecution's ability to provide evidence of communication between Segura and Brandi could significantly strengthen their case. However, it remains to be seen if they can deliver on this promise and provide further substantiation during the trial.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The prosecutor claims that Henry Segura lied to the police, suggesting he had something to hide, and points out his numerous affairs and judgments against him.

• The defense argues that lying does not make him a murderer and questions the prosecution's ability to prove Segura's guilt.

• The prosecutor highlights potential text messages and communications between Segura and Brandi to strengthen their case.