"The WORST Movie In the World" | Joe Budden's HONEST Review of Equalizer 3 | Summary and Q&A
TL;DR
The reviewer found Equalizer 3 unsatisfactory compared to previous installments.
Key Insights
- 🖤 Equalizer 3 was critiqued for lacking the character depth that enthusiasts appreciated in earlier films.
- 🦸♂️ The transformation of Denzel's character from an ordinary man to a hero was a key element that resonated with fans in the first two films.
- 😑 The reviewer expressed a sense of frustration over the film's one-dimensional portrayal of the main character, indicating a missed opportunity for compelling storytelling.
- ❓ There was a notable absence of humor and lightness in Equalizer 3, contrasting with the blend of action and relatability offered by its predecessors.
- 😆 Some viewers may find entertainment value in Equalizer 3, but ardent fans of the first installments are less likely to feel satisfied.
- 🤑 The review implies that character-driven plots typically yield a richer movie experience than focused solely on action.
- 🖤 The inclusion of cultural references, like comparing Denzel's character to Batman, demonstrates the expectation of depth in superhero portrayals, which was lacking in Equalizer 3.
Transcript
I went to see equalizer 3 horrible if you listening don't go see equalizer the worst movie in the world if you spend money really I like equalizers I like equalizer equalizer one and two I loved I I ain't love them they was good but it wasn't enough for me to spend equalizer it's acceptable all right cool you're crazy the equalizers and The Equaliz... Read More
Questions & Answers
Q: Why did the reviewer dislike Equalizer 3 compared to the first two films?
The reviewer believed that Equalizer 3 lacked the engaging character development present in the first two films. They appreciated how the earlier movies showcased Denzel Washington as a relatable character before revealing his action hero persona, creating a compelling narrative that was absent in the third installment.
Q: What specific elements of the main character's portrayal were commented on?
The reviewer noted that in the first two movies, Denzel's character was depicted as a man with a normal life who became an action hero when necessary. However, in Equalizer 3, they criticized the character for being a "stone cold killer" throughout the film, leading to a loss of the relatable traits that made him interesting in earlier films.
Q: Did the reviewer mention any specific scenes that stood out to them?
Yes, the reviewer highlighted the shocking moment when Denzel’s character gets shot, referring to it as a "bumper." This scene was noted for its intensity, yet they felt it did not compensate for the overall lack of narrative depth and character engagement throughout the film.
Q: How did the reviewer's past viewing experiences influence their opinion?
The reviewer mentioned enjoying the first two Equalizer films and praised them for being well-done, which set their expectations high for Equalizer 3. Their familiarity with the franchise and affection for earlier films likely contributed to their disappointment with the third installment's perceived decline in quality.
Summary & Key Takeaways
-
The reviewer expresses disappointment in Equalizer 3, stating it fails to capture the appeal of the first two movies. They highlight a shift in the character portrayal and overall narrative.
-
Key features of the first two films were noted, particularly Denzel Washington's dual role as an everyday man and an action hero, which resonated with the audience.
-
The review criticizes the lack of character development in Equalizer 3, where Denzel's character is reduced to a one-dimensional killer, diminishing the franchise's depth.