Revisiting the 60/40 Mindset in a Mult-Asset World | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

A panel of experts discusses the success of the 60/40 asset allocation model over the past 10 years and debates the future implications for multi-asset investing.

Key Insights

• 💪 The 60/40 asset allocation model has a strong track record of success, outperforming other investment options like hedge funds.
• 🍉 Long-term investing and balancing risk are important considerations for endowments and foundations.
• 🔒 Private equity offers potential for alpha but requires careful manager selection.
• 🔒 The secondary market provides opportunities for vintage exposure in private equity.
• 🏛️ Alignment of interests between GPs and LPs is crucial in building successful portfolios.
• 🪡 The panelists highlight the need for ongoing due diligence and emphasize the importance of qualitative analysis.
• 🤩 Diversification and global investing are key strategies for multi-asset portfolios.

Transcript

it's interesting the top of revisiting the 60/40 mindset in a multi asset world we had a panelist prep call just about two weeks ago and one of the panelists said why are we still talking about this and before I could answer the questions Ally answered it herself which is we've got all endowment of foundation money represented up here and if you lo... Read More

Questions & Answers

Q: Why is the panel still discussing the 60/40 asset allocation model?

The 60/40 benchmark is the starting point for every portfolio and offers opportunities to add alpha through diversification and global investing.

Q: Has the 60/40 model been fair in the past decade with central banks providing a safety net?

The 60/40 model has been fair, but the risk for endowments lies in underperforming their target returns and eroding their corpus. The model fared better than hedge funds during the financial crisis.

Q: Should the mindset of investors change for the next 10 years regarding the 60/40 model?

The panelists agree that the future is uncertain, but maintaining asset allocation views while seeking less risky, more diverse investment opportunities may be prudent.

Q: How do the panelists view hedge funds and their role in portfolios?

Hedge funds can provide diversification from equity-heavy portfolios, and their success depends on the strategies employed. Due diligence is crucial in selecting managers.

Q: Are private equity investments inefficiently priced and a viable source for alpha?

Private equity offers the potential for higher returns than public markets due to the illiquidity premium, but finding top-performing managers requires thorough due diligence and ongoing evaluation.

Q: How can investors access vintage exposures in private equity?

Secondary market transactions allow investors to gain exposure to previous vintage years, but the panelists have varying degrees of involvement in the secondary market.

Q: Is there alignment of interests between general partners (GPs) and limited partners (LPs) in private equity?

Some concerns exist about GPs charging high fees (super carry), but the panelists emphasize the importance of alignment, thorough due diligence, and the net return after fees.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The 60/40 asset allocation model has outperformed Ivy League endowments and proven successful over the past 10 years.

• The panelists emphasize the importance of benchmarking returns and considering global investing and diversification in a multi-asset portfolio.

• While central banks have provided a floor for drawdown risk, the panelists acknowledge the need for long-term planning and the unpredictable nature of markets.