Preliminary thoughts on proxy delegation with Pablo Montagnes | a16z crypto research talks | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

Proxy voting and delegation can be used to increase engagement and participation in governance, but careful consideration is needed to ensure informed and meaningful voting. This approach is being implemented by BlackRock in corporate governance.

Key Insights

• 😘 Low voter turnout in web 3 projects can lead to adverse outcomes and a lack of engagement.
• ✊ Increasing voter participation can protect against capture, ensure a balanced distribution of power, and encourage informed decision-making.
• 🥺 Delegation can incentivize engagement and potentially lead to better quality and quantity of votes.
• 🎨 The choice of delegates and the design of delegation schemes should be carefully considered to ensure effective governance.
• 👾 In the corporate governance space, asset managers like BlackRock are exploring the implementation of proxy voting and delegation to enhance shareholder engagement.
• ⛔ Centralization in delegation schemes can limit the choices available to token holders and hinder the development of a diverse and decentralized system.
• 👤 Clear and user-friendly interfaces can facilitate delegation and improve the voting experience for token holders.
• 😒 The use of brands and reputations can help guide token holders in selecting delegates, but careful consideration should be given to the selection process and potential conflicts of interest.

Transcript

all right great we're going to get started we're super excited to have our I believe our last official talk of uh on governance for governance week we have uh Pablo montanis from Emer University it's a professor in the political science department in the quantitative Theory and methods group or Department I think I have the right Department uh and ... Read More

Questions & Answers

Q: What are the concerns associated with low voter turnout in web 3 projects?

Low voter turnout can lead to adversarial proposals being made and implemented without sufficient scrutiny. It can also concentrate power in the hands of a few, leading to a lack of belief in the project and potential capture.

Q: How can delegation of voting address the problem of low turnout?

Delegation allows individuals to delegate their votes to others who are more informed or motivated to vote. This can increase engagement and lead to better quality and higher quantity of votes being cast.

Q: Are there potential issues with random or uninformed voting in high turnout scenarios?

Yes, high turnout does not guarantee informed voting. To address this, incentives can be designed to reward informed voting behavior. Weaker incentives may be more effective to avoid undue influence on voting outcomes.

Q: Are there parallels between proxy voting in corporations and web 3 projects?

Both corporate governance and web 3 governance aim to maximize value or performance. However, the presence of a board of directors in corporations adds an additional layer of decision-making, whereas web 3 projects often allow for direct voting by token holders.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Low voter turnout in web 3 projects can lead to ineffective governance and potential adversarial proposals.

• Increasing voter participation can protect against capture, ensure a balanced distribution of power, and encourage informed decision-making.

• Delegation of voting can incentivize engagement and potentially lead to better quality and quantity of votes.