Jury Hands Down Guilty Verdict For Blake Scanlon After Stabbing Girlfriend to Death | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

Blake Scanland stands accused of first-degree murder, with the defense arguing for a charge of voluntary manslaughter based on the defendant's emotional state at the time of the crime.

Key Insights

• 🈂️ The trial centers around the charges of first-degree murder against Blake Scanland.
• ⌛ The defense argues for a charge of voluntary manslaughter based on the defendant's emotional state at the time of the crime.
• 🎁 The prosecution presents evidence of the defendant's actions before, during, and after the crime to support a charge of first-degree murder.
• 🎁 The closing arguments revolve around the defendant's emotional state and the evidence presented in the trial.

Transcript

e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e now please be seated good morning honor good morning ladies and gentlemen we are back on the record this morning on the matter of the Commonwealth versus Blake scanland Andi 1979 CR 168 counts 1 and two Council or presid Mr scandin is present okay an we need to take u... Read More

Questions & Answers

Q: What are the charges against Blake Scanland?

Blake Scanland is charged with first-degree murder in the trial.

Q: What argument does the defense make regarding the charge?

The defense argues for a charge of voluntary manslaughter, based on the defendant's emotional state and overwhelming circumstances at the time of the crime.

Q: What evidence does the prosecution present?

The prosecution presents evidence of the defendant's actions before, during, and after the crime to support a charge of first-degree murder.

Q: What are the closing arguments of both sides?

The defense urges the jury to consider the defendant's emotional state and overwhelming circumstances, while the prosecution argues for a conviction of first-degree murder based on the evidence presented.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The trial involves the Commonwealth vs. Blake Scanland, who is charged with first-degree murder, with the defense arguing for voluntary manslaughter.

• The defense presents evidence of the defendant's emotional state and overwhelming circumstances, suggesting that his actions were impulsive and not premeditated.

• The prosecution contends that the evidence supports a charge of first-degree murder, presenting evidence of the defendant's actions before, during, and after the crime.

• Both sides present their closing arguments, with the defense urging the jury to consider the defendant's emotional state and the prosecution arguing for a conviction of first-degree murder.