Is the Law like a Comic Book or D&D Game? Dworkin's "Law as Integrity" | Philosophy Tube | Summary and Q&A

41.1K views
September 11, 2015
by
Philosophy Tube
YouTube video player
Is the Law like a Comic Book or D&D Game? Dworkin's "Law as Integrity" | Philosophy Tube

TL;DR

Ronald Dworkin's philosophy of law can be compared to comic book writing and tabletop gaming in terms of continuity and application.

Install to Summarize YouTube Videos and Get Transcripts

Key Insights

  • ✍️ Ronald Dworkin's philosophy of law aligns with the concept of continuity in comic book writing and tabletop gaming.
  • 🧑‍⚖️ Judges should ensure their rulings are consistent with existing legal precedents and fit into the overall body of law.
  • 🧑‍⚖️ Judges are bound by legal rules, unlike comic book writers and tabletop GMs who have more creative freedom.
  • 👮 The purpose of law, according to Dworkin, is to portray a just and coherent system that treats all citizens equally.
  • 🧑‍⚖️ Judges should apply the law with integrity and uphold its purpose by justifiably coercing individuals.
  • 👻 Dworkin's philosophy does not allow judges to create new laws.
  • 👮 Conflicting rulings would undermine the ability of the law to justly coerce individuals.

Transcript

OLLY: -The philosophy of law is like a galaxy of stars. There are many philosophers in the galaxy, but some are so massive and so full of hot gas that their gravitational pull influences all others. one of these supergiants is Ronald Dworkin. There's a cool paradigm between how Ronald Dworkin says the law should be applied, like by courts and judge... Read More

Questions & Answers

Q: How does Dworkin's analogy between comic book writing and law apply in terms of continuity?

Dworkin suggests that judges should make rulings that align with existing precedents and fit into the overall body of law, similar to how comic book writers ensure continuity in their storylines.

Q: Are judges allowed to create new laws according to Dworkin's philosophy?

No, Dworkin argues that judges do not have the authority to create new laws. Their role is to interpret existing laws and make rulings based on legal rules and the specifics of the case at hand.

Q: What is the purpose of law according to Dworkin?

Dworkin believes that the purpose of law is to portray a coherent and just system that treats all citizens equally. Judges should aim to uphold this purpose by applying the law with integrity and ensuring it justifiably coerces individuals.

Q: How does Dworkin's philosophy address the potential for conflicting rulings?

Dworkin argues that there can only be one correct ruling, determined by an ideal judge termed "Hercules." If multiple conflicting rulings were considered equally good, the law would lack the ability to justly coerce individuals.

Summary & Key Takeaways

  • Ronald Dworkin's philosophy of law suggests that judges should apply the law in a way that is consistent with existing precedents and appropriate to the specific case, similar to how comic book writers and tabletop GMs approach continuity.

  • Dworkin argues that judges should think of themselves as authors contributing to a larger narrative, ensuring their rulings fit into the overall story.

  • However, unlike comic book writers and tabletop GMs, judges are bound by legal rules that constrain their decision-making and there can only be one correct ruling.

Share This Summary 📚

Summarize YouTube Videos and Get Video Transcripts with 1-Click

Download browser extensions on:

Explore More Summaries from Philosophy Tube 📚

Summarize YouTube Videos and Get Video Transcripts with 1-Click

Download browser extensions on: