He's Doing It Again | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

EDP-445 claims his involvement in the cupcake sting operation was all acting for a movie production, but his poorly photoshopped emails and lack of credibility fail to explain his inappropriate behavior with minors.

Key Insights

• 🍂 EDP-445 repeatedly resurfaces on the internet after his fall from grace, attempting to regain his audience's acceptance.
• 🤢 The cupcake sting operation was just one instance of his inappropriate behavior with minors, supported by video evidence.
• 💌 EDP-445's method acting defense lacks credibility due to poorly photoshopped emails and inconsistencies in his story.

Transcript

I have sworn multiple times that I would stop talking about edp-445 but just like most people's New Year's resolutions about going to the gym I'm going to have to break it every few months for the last couple of years like clockwork he will try and come back to the internet after his historic Fall From Grace after being caught in the now Infamous c... Read More

Questions & Answers

Q: How does EDP-445 try to prove his innocence regarding the cupcake sting operation?

EDP-445 claims that his involvement in the sting was part of a movie production and he was method acting as a child molester.

Q: What evidence does EDP-445 provide to support his defense?

He shares screenshots of emails from Chet Goldstein, supposedly the person conducting the investigation, praising his acting skills and offering a role in a new film.

Q: Are EDP-445's emails authentic?

No, the screenshots of the emails are poorly photoshopped, with visible inconsistencies and lack of proper cropping.

Q: Does EDP-445's defense explain his inappropriate behavior with minors?

Even if his defense is assumed to be true, it does not justify or explain his sexually explicit conversations and actions with minors.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• EDP-445 suggests that his involvement in the cupcake sting operation was part of a movie production and he was merely method acting.

• He shares screenshots of emails from Chet Goldstein that allegedly support his claim, but they are poorly photoshopped and lack credibility.

• Even if his defense is assumed to be true, it does not justify his inappropriate conversations and behavior with minors.